FFR Impact Scoring for Connected Vascular Lesion Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining vascular health, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), often rely on multiple parameters that can introduce variability and noise in decision-making, particularly in treatments like PCI and CABG, and do not effectively account for the overall impact of vascular disease on blood flow.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a continuous or near-continuous map of FFR values to calculate an FFR impact score, summarizing the overall impact of vascular disease by combining focal and global measures of FFR, providing a single, automated metric for treatment planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple parameters are used to determine vascular health, then comprehensive assessment is achieved, but variability and noise in decision-making increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment reliabilityVSAvoiddecision precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple FFR measurements across different vascular segments into a single integrated FFR impact score. This merging approach maintains comprehensive assessment while reducing variability by consolidating multiple parameters into one unified metric that captures overall vascular disease impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms multiple individual FFR parameters into a new composite parameter (FFR impact score) that reflects the overall functional impact of vascular disease. This parameter transformation reduces noise while preserving clinically relevant information about vascular health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If detailed FFR mapping is performed, then comprehensive vascular assessment is obtained, but complexity of analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential functional impact information from detailed FFR maps by calculating an integrated FFR impact score. This extraction process removes unnecessary complexity while retaining the most clinically relevant information about overall vascular disease impact on blood flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple FFR values from different vascular segments into a single FFR impact score, simplifying the analysis while preserving comprehensive vascular assessment information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If manual assessment of vascular health is performed, then detailed evaluation is possible, but variability in treatment decisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation precisionVSAvoiddecision consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated calculation system that computes the FFR impact score directly from FFR map data without requiring manual interpretation. This automation eliminates human variability while maintaining detailed evaluation precision, improving decision consistency across different cases and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3998939B1Functional impact of vascular lesions
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 CATHWORKS LTD
  • EP3998939B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3998939B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3998939B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for determining a functional impact of vascular lesions are disclosed. An example method includes calculating estimates of a single functional blood flow metric (for example, fractional flow reserve calculated from angiographic images) for multiple locations in each of a plurality of connected vascular branches. The method includes converting these estimates into FFR impact scores, which are indicative of the overall impact of occlusive vascular disease on the connected vascular branches.