Focused Ion Beam Energy Filtering for Spot Size and Beam Current

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing focused ion beam (FIB) systems face challenges in providing charged-particle beams (CPBs) with variable beam currents and energy spreads, which are essential for various semiconductor, material science, and life science applications.

Innovation Solution

The system employs an extractor aperture plate to create axial and off-axis CPBs, with the off-axis beam being chromatically dispersed and filtered to select specific energy spreads. A beam steering deflector directs the selected CPB portion to a workpiece, allowing for variable beam currents and energy spreads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If beam current is limited to suppress Coulomb interactions, then spot size is improved, but beam current is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespot sizeVSAvoidbeam current
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is segmented into multiple spatial channels (on-axis and off-axis regions) that can be independently controlled. The off-axis region provides high current for suppressing Coulomb interactions, while the on-axis region provides low energy spread for precise spot size control. This segmentation allows both contradictory requirements to be satisfied simultaneously by distributing different beam portions to different functional regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the beam are given different properties: the off-axis region is optimized for high current density while the on-axis region is optimized for low energy spread. This local quality differentiation allows the system to provide both high beam current (for spot size control via Coulomb suppression) and low energy spread (for precise spot size) in different parts of the beam, resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If energy spread is reduced through chromatic dispersion and filtering, then spot size is improved, but beam current is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespot sizeVSAvoidbeam current
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into on-axis and off-axis spatial channels. The off-axis channel undergoes chromatic dispersion and filtering to reduce energy spread, while the on-axis channel maintains high current. This segmentation allows the system to provide both low energy spread (for spot size precision) and high beam current by combining the filtered off-axis beam with the high-current on-axis beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A filter aperture acts as an intermediary element that selectively transmits portions of the chromatically dispersed off-axis beam with desired energy characteristics. This intermediary allows precise control of energy spread while maintaining the ability to adjust beam current by controlling the transmission characteristics of the filter aperture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If beam current is increased for substantial current applications, then productivity is improved, but Coulomb interactions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam currentVSAvoidCoulomb interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The high current beam is segmented into on-axis and off-axis regions. The off-axis region is subjected to chromatic dispersion and filtering that reduces energy spread, which in turn reduces the impact of Coulomb interactions. This allows the system to maintain high beam current for productivity while the filtered portion provides reduced Coulomb interaction effects for precise processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If filter aperture is used to select energy spread, then energy spread control is improved, but beam current is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy spreadVSAvoidbeam current
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides multiple beam output modes from a single beam source: high current mode (using on-axis beam), low energy spread mode (using filtered off-axis beam), and combined mode (using both). This multi-functionality allows the filter aperture to be used selectively depending on whether energy spread control or beam current is the priority, resolving the contradiction by making the system adaptable to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the delivery of CPBs with tailored beam currents and energy spreads, reducing sputtering and damage to the workpiece while enhancing the versatility of FIB systems for diverse applications.

Implementation Method 1

the CPB lens is operable to focus the axial CPB and chromatically disperse the off-axis CPB

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatic aberration:

Implementation Method 2

a beam steering deflector operable to deflect the axial CPB or the selected portion of the off-axis CPB to a workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic deflection: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250157779A1Minimization of energy spread in focused ion beam (FIB) systems
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 FEI CO
  • US20250157779A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157779A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157779A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Charged-particle beam (CPB) optical systems can include a beam acceptance aperture plate defining a first acceptance aperture and at least one second acceptance aperture, situated with respect to a CPB source so that a first CPB is transmitted by the first acceptance aperture and a second CPB is transmitted by a second acceptance aperture. A CPB lens is situated to receive the first and second CPBs from the beam acceptance aperture plate and direct the first and second CPBs towards a filter aperture plate to transmit selected spectral portion of the second CPB. The selected spectral component of the first CPB can be selectively directed to a workpiece by a beam steering deflector along the same axis. In some examples, the first and second CPBs have different beam currents and only one is directed to a workpiece.