Fiber Bragg Grating Characterization via Iterative Phase Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for characterizing fiber Bragg gratings are complex, noise-sensitive, and time-consuming, particularly when measuring the complex reflection and transmission impulse responses, as they often require interferometric techniques and are limited by the resolution of the input laser pulse.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates the phase term of the complex reflection or transmission spectrum from measured amplitude data, using iterative processing to recover the complex impulse response, which involves multiplying the measured amplitude by an estimated phase term and applying constraints to the inverse Fourier transform, allowing for faster and less noise-sensitive characterization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If interferometric techniques are used to measure complex reflection impulse response, then both phase and amplitude can be measured, but the measurement becomes more complex and noise-sensitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary information (amplitude spectrum) from the measurement process, eliminating the need for complex interferometric setups. By using amplitude-only measurements combined with iterative processing to recover phase and impulse response, the method removes unnecessary measurement complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical interferometric measurement systems with computational methods. Instead of using optical interferometers to directly measure phase and amplitude, the invention uses amplitude measurements processed through iterative algorithms (such as Gerchberg-Saxton or Fienup algorithms) to computationally recover the complex impulse response, substituting mechanical/optical complexity with computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If ultra-short pulses are used to measure impulse response directly, then temporal resolution is improved, but the measurement becomes limited by pulse width and requires complex interferometric techniques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal resolutionVSAvoidmeasurement technique complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a computational copy of the impulse response through iterative processing rather than directly measuring it with ultra-short pulses. By measuring the amplitude spectrum and computationally reconstructing the impulse response using constraints (such as non-negativity and support constraints), the method obtains temporal resolution without requiring physically ultra-short pulses or complex interferometric detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies constraints and preliminary information about the impulse response (such as support bounds, non-negativity, or known structural properties) before the full reconstruction process. This preliminary action guides the iterative algorithm to converge faster and achieve better temporal resolution without requiring ultra-short input pulses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional amplitude-only measurement is used, then the measurement is simpler and less noise-sensitive, but phase information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system simplicityVSAvoidphase information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the measured amplitude spectrum is repeatedly transformed into the time domain, constraints are applied, and the result is transformed back to update the amplitude estimate. This iterative feedback process gradually recovers the phase information that was initially lost, using the constraints as guidance to converge to the correct solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the problem from the frequency domain to the time domain and back repeatedly, using constraints in the time domain to recover frequency domain phase information. By switching between domains and applying constraints in one dimension, the method recovers information that appears lost in the original measurement dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS7385683B2Method of characterizing fiber Bragg gratings using iterative processing
Publication Date: 2008.06.10 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US7385683B2 patent drawing
  • US7385683B2 patent drawing
  • US7385683B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method determines a complex reflection impulse response of a fiber Bragg grating. The method includes providing a measured amplitude of a complex reflection spectrum of the fiber Bragg grating. The method further includes providing an estimated phase term of the complex reflection spectrum. The method further includes multiplying the measured amplitude and the estimated phase term to generate an estimated complex reflection spectrum. The method further includes calculating an inverse Fourier transform of the estimated complex reflection spectrum, wherein the inverse Fourier transform is a function of time. The method further includes calculating an estimated complex reflection impulse response by applying at least one constraint to the inverse Fourier transform of the estimated complex reflection spectrum.