Optical Fiber Cleaving via Multi-Axial Compressive Stress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for cleaving optical fibers are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often require expensive laser equipment, necessitating a more efficient and cost-effective process for forming high-quality optical surfaces in fiber optic connectors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the propagation of a crack across an optical fiber under controlled multi-axial compressive stress, using a bulge formed by localized heating and tension to restrict the crack from penetrating a cross-sectional region, allowing for precise breaking and polishing of the fiber without traditional cleaving tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional mechanical cleaving and polishing methods are used, then optical surfaces can be formed, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical surface qualityVSAvoidconnectorization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical cleaving tools with a controlled fracture method using a scoring element that creates a precise break point, followed by a breaking mechanism that separates the fiber at that point. This substitution eliminates the need for multiple mechanical polishing steps while maintaining optical surface quality, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and parameters of the fiber by applying controlled stress and temperature at the break point. The scoring element creates a localized stress concentration, and the breaking mechanism applies controlled force to propagate the fracture. This parameter control allows for precise breaking without requiring extensive polishing, thus improving both speed and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If laser cleaving is used, then cleaving can be achieved, but expensive laser equipment is required and polishing is still needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaving precisionVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a disposable scoring element that is inexpensive compared to laser equipment. The scoring element is consumed in the process of creating the break point, but it replaces the need for expensive, sophisticated laser systems. This approach maintains cleaving precision while dramatically reducing equipment costs and simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the complex optical and thermal fields of laser cleaving with a simpler mechanical scoring and breaking system. The scoring element creates a localized stress concentration that guides the fracture, replacing the need for expensive laser equipment while achieving comparable or superior precision through controlled mechanical action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional cleaving tools are used, then fiber separation can be achieved, but the process requires multiple polishing steps to form high-quality optical surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical surface qualityVSAvoidtime for polishing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by using the scoring element to create a precise break point before the actual breaking occurs. This pre-positioning of the fracture point ensures that the break occurs at the exact desired location with minimal surface damage, eliminating or reducing the need for subsequent polishing steps and saving significant time in the connectorization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the multi-step mechanical polishing system with a controlled fracture system. The scoring element creates a localized stress concentration that guides the fracture to occur precisely at the desired location, producing a clean break surface that requires minimal or no polishing. This substitution dramatically reduces the time required while maintaining or improving optical surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables rapid, low-cost, and high-quality separation of optical fiber lengths, reducing the need for expensive equipment and simplifying the field installation of fiber optic connectors while maintaining precise alignment and communication efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The propagating occurs while a cross-sectional region of the optical fiber is in a state of multi-axial compressive stress, and the multi-axial compressive stress of the cross-sectional region extends across the optical fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressive stress: Compression

Implementation Method 2

using a bulge formed by localized heating and tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLocalized heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

causing tension in at least a portion of the optical fiber, and propagating at least one crack across the optical fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Data Source

PatentUS10071497B2Compressive wedge cleaving of optical fibers
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
  • US10071497B2 patent drawing
  • US10071497B2 patent drawing
  • US10071497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Lengths of an optical fiber may be broken apart from one another while a cross-sectional region of the optical fiber is in a state of multi-axial compressive stress, and the multi-axial compressive stress extends across the optical fiber. The breaking can include propagating a crack across the optical fiber. The crack can be positioned in sufficiently close proximity to the cross-sectional region so that the multi-axial compressive stress restricts the crack from penetrating the cross-sectional region. At least a portion of the optical fiber may be in tension during the breaking.