Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Toughening Through Pre-Crack Bridging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fiber-reinforced concrete designs exhibit low toughening efficiency as the fiber bridging effect is activated only after the main crack is initiated, leading to inefficient energy absorption and material failure.

Innovation Solution

A new design method where the fiber bridging effect occurs both before and after the main crack initiation, involving a ductile composite mortar with controlled parameters and aggregates to promote multiple cracking and fiber bridging at the micro-to-meso scale, optimizing the mortar-aggregate interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional fiber-reinforced concrete design is used where fiber bridging is activated only after main crack initiation, then the design process is simple and independent stages can be maintained, but the toughening efficiency is low and energy absorption is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process simplicityVSAvoidenergy absorption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by designing the fiber distribution and mortar-aggregate interaction before crack initiation occurs. The fiber arrangement and interface properties are pre-configured to enable crack control at micro-crack stages, transforming the passive post-crack fiber bridging into active pre-crack and during-crack fiber reinforcement, thereby improving energy absorption efficiency without significantly complicating the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If fiber content is increased to improve toughness, then the material ductility and total energy absorption improve, but the material cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcrete toughnessVSAvoidfiber content
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key parameters including fiber aspect ratio, fiber distribution pattern, and mortar-aggregate interface properties to optimize fiber efficiency. By adjusting these parameters, the design achieves high toughness with reduced fiber content, as the optimized fiber-matrix interaction and crack control mechanisms maximize the contribution of each fiber to energy absorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the fiber bridging effect is activated only after main crack initiation, then the two-stage design method (matrix design and fiber selection) can be maintained independently, but the fiber utilization efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign method complexityVSAvoidfiber utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The design method incorporates preliminary considerations of fiber distribution and mortar-aggregate interaction in the first stage (matrix design), rather than treating fiber selection as a separate second stage. This preliminary integration ensures that fibers are optimally positioned and oriented before cracking occurs, significantly improving fiber utilization efficiency while maintaining a systematic design approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the previously independent two-stage design methods into an integrated approach where matrix design and fiber selection are coupled through the mortar-aggregate interaction mechanism. The fiber reinforcement design is combined with the crack control strategy from the outset, creating a unified design framework that improves overall system efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly improves composite toughness and material ductility while maintaining low production costs, enhancing fiber utilization efficiency and energy absorption.

Implementation Method 1

chopped fibers are added and distributed randomly into concrete to establish a fiber bridging effect on cracks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiber bridging effect:

Implementation Method 2

additional energy can be absorbed through fiber debonding, pull-out, or rupture at the fiber/matrix interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiber debonding:

Implementation Method 3

fiber debonding, pull-out, or rupture at the fiber/matrix interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

crack bridging, deflection, and trapping by aggregates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrack bridging:

Implementation Method 5

crack bridging, deflection, and trapping by aggregates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking:

Implementation Method 6

Cementitious materials such as concrete are a typical class of brittle solids and absorb energy mainly through brittle fracture during the material failure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrittle fracture: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS12380259B1Methods for toughening of fiber-reinforced concrete
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 WUHAN UNIV
  • US12380259B1 patent drawing
  • US12380259B1 patent drawing
  • US12380259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for toughening of fiber-reinforced concrete in the field of concrete technologies is disclosed. The method comprises (1) design of mortar matrix; (2) design of ductile composite mortar with strain-hardening characteristic; (3) iterative design between the ductile composite mortar and aggregate; and (4) load-carrying capacity verification and optimization. In the process of external loading, mesoscale multiple cracking and strain-hardening behaviors are developed in the interstitial matrix between adjacent aggregate particles.