Fiber-Based Cutting Tool Packaging with Segmented Snap-Fit Covers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current packaging for cutting tools, such as secateurs, often uses non-recyclable materials like plastic, which poses sustainability issues and limits user interaction and trial functionality, while also potentially compromising safety and security.

Innovation Solution

A packaging made from integrally formed, fiber-based materials like paper pulp, which can be molded into desired shapes, featuring a snap-fit design for handles and a transparent film for protection and visibility, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while enhancing ergonomics and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a transparent plastic cover member is used to cover the cutting blades, then safety is improved by minimizing injury risk, but user interaction and trial functionality are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury riskVSAvoiduser interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging is divided into separate cover portions for different handles, with each cover portion being independently removable. This allows users to remove one cover at a time to test individual handles while the other handle remains protected, thus enabling user interaction while maintaining safety protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover portions are designed to be dynamically removable and reattachable rather than fixed permanently. Users can remove covers to test handles and reattach them when done, providing dynamic control over accessibility versus protection, resolving the contradiction between user interaction and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional plastic packaging is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but sustainability and recyclability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidsustainability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging material is changed from traditional plastic to molded fiber material, representing a parameter change in material composition. This substitution maintains manufacturing simplicity through integral molding while dramatically improving sustainability and recyclability, as fiber-based materials are biodegradable and recyclable unlike conventional plastics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging utilizes composite fiber-based materials that combine the ease of molding properties of traditional plastics with the environmental benefits of natural fibers. This composite approach allows the packaging to be manufactured using similar molding techniques while achieving improved sustainability characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If the cutting tool is completely removed from packaging for testing, then full user interaction is enabled, but security and safety threats increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interactionVSAvoidsecurity threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring complete removal of the cutting tool from packaging, the packaging is segmented into removable cover portions that allow selective access to individual handles. Users can test handles by removing only the necessary covers while the tool remains partially contained, reducing security risks while enabling adequate user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The removable cover portions act as intermediaries between the user and the cutting tool handles. They provide a controlled interface that allows users to interact with the tool for testing while maintaining a protective barrier, thus enabling user interaction without the security threats associated with complete tool removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If limited operations are allowed within packaging, then security is improved, but user interaction capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging transitions from a static sealed structure to a dynamic system with selectively removable covers. Users can dynamically adjust the level of access by removing or reattaching covers as needed, enabling adequate user interaction for testing while maintaining security when covers are in place, thus resolving the contradiction between security and user interaction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4217291B1Package for cutting tool
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 HUSQVARNA AB
  • EP4217291B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4217291B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4217291B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A packaging (100) for a cutting tool (150) includes a body (110) and one or more cover portions (120). The one or more cover portions (120) at least partially support the cutting tool (150) with the body (110). The packaging (100) is characterized in that the body (110) and the one or more cover portions (120) are integrally formed and made by fiber-based packaging. The one or more cover portion (120) are a first portion (130) and a second portion (140). The first portion (130) defines a wall profile (132) with the body (110) and the second portion (140) defines a curved profile (142) adjacent the body (110) to at least partially support the cutting tool (150) with the body (110).