Fiber Optic Node Location Mapping via Time of Flight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional smoke detection systems require manual and error-prone methods for mapping the physical location of detectors within a facility, which are not machine-readable and do not provide real-time feedback for maintenance or control systems.

Innovation Solution

A fiber optic system with a harness and control system that determines the physical location of nodes within a predetermined area by emitting and receiving light signals, allowing for interactive display and control of detector locations and sensitivity adjustments based on risk regions and operational status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual mapping methods are used to determine detector locations, then the process is simple to implement, but the mapping is tedious, error-prone, and not machine readable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation mapping accuracyVSAvoidmapping system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical mapping methods with an automated optical system. Emitters and detectors use light-based time-of-flight measurements to automatically determine physical locations, eliminating tedious manual measurement and drawing processes while providing machine-readable output that can be directly displayed on fire alarm panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces emitters as intermediary devices that facilitate automatic location mapping. These emitters send light signals to detectors, enabling the system to automatically calculate and determine physical locations without direct manual intervention, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If individual sensor units with processing components are positioned at each sensing location, then detection sensitivity is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidsystem component quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of multiple individual sensor units into a centralized detection system. Instead of each sensing location having its own independent sensor unit with processing components, the system uses a network of fiber optic cables connecting multiple detection points to a central processing unit, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection sensitivity through coordinated operation of distributed detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal detection architecture where a single centralized processing system serves multiple sensing locations. The fiber optic network enables one processing unit to handle data from numerous detectors throughout the facility, eliminating the need for redundant processing components at each location while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If physical maps are created manually, then the process is straightforward, but the maps must be redone with layout changes and are not automatically displayed on control panels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap update capabilityVSAvoidmap creation and update time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual map creation and updating processes with automated electronic mapping. The system uses light-based distance measurements to automatically generate and update digital representations of facility layouts, eliminating the need to manually redraw maps when configurations change and enabling automatic display on fire alarm control panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automatic feedback mechanisms where the detection system continuously monitors and reports detector locations and status to the control panel. This real-time feedback enables the system to automatically update its internal map representation without manual intervention, ensuring the control panel always displays current facility布局和detector positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate, automated mapping and control of detector locations, improving maintenance efficiency and reducing false alarms by adjusting sensitivity based on risk regions and operational conditions.

Implementation Method 1

A control system is operably coupled to the at least one emitter and the at least one node to determine a physical location of the at least one node relative to the predetermined area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

Light is transmitted from each of the plurality of nodes and scattered light is received at each of the plurality of nodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS11361643B2High sensitivity fiber optic based detection system
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION LLC
  • US11361643B2 patent drawing
  • US11361643B2 patent drawing
  • US11361643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for locating a detection system within a predetermined area includes a fiber optic harness defining at least one node in communication with the predetermined area. Light is received at the at least one node. At least one emitter is arranged in communication with the at least one node. A control system is operably coupled to the at least one emitter and the at least one node to determine a physical location of the at least one node relative to the predetermined area.