Automatic Fiber Placement Head Single Cutter Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated fiber placement machines are complex, large, and heavy, making them unsuitable for small composite laminate assemblies and applications requiring high placement resolution, and are also expensive due to their complexity.

Innovation Solution

A simplified automatic fiber placement apparatus with a single cutting mechanism that simultaneously cuts all tape strips, reducing mechanical complexity and size while allowing for contoured or ramped tape patterns through sequential starting of individual tape strips and simultaneous cutting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent cutting mechanisms are used for each tape strip, then each tape strip can be cut independently, but the device becomes complex, large, and heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent cutting capabilityVSAvoidplacement head complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent cutting mechanisms into a single cutting mechanism that can simultaneously cut all tape strips. The cutting mechanism includes a single cutter that moves across the width of the band to cut all tapes at once, eliminating the need for separate cutters for each tape strip. This reduces device complexity while maintaining the ability to cut tapes independently through controlled activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single cutting mechanism is designed to perform the function of multiple cutters by being able to cut all tape strips simultaneously. The cutter can be activated to cut any number of tapes in the band, providing universal cutting capability across all tape positions without requiring dedicated cutters for each position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent cutting mechanisms are used for each tape strip, then each tape strip can be cut independently, but the size and weight of the placement head increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent cutting capabilityVSAvoidplacement head weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent cutting mechanisms into a single cutting mechanism that can simultaneously cut all tape strips. The cutting mechanism includes a single cutter that moves across the width of the band to cut all tapes at once, eliminating the need for separate cutters for each tape strip. This reduces device complexity while maintaining the ability to cut tapes independently through controlled activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If a single cutting mechanism is used to cut all tape strips simultaneously, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to achieve high placement resolution may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement head complexityVSAvoidtape placement resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of the single cutting mechanism to achieve precise placement. The cutter can be selectively activated to cut specific tapes at specific positions along the band, allowing for high placement resolution. The system dynamically controls which tapes are cut and where, maintaining precision despite using a single cutting mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary action by sequentially starting the placement of individual tape strips before cutting. The tapes are laid down in a controlled sequence with staggered starts, and then the single cutting mechanism cuts them at the appropriate position. This preliminary positioning ensures high placement resolution is achieved before the cutting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If current complex placement heads are used, then operational flexibility is maintained, but they are expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidplacement head complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent cutting mechanisms into a single cutting mechanism that can simultaneously cut all tape strips. The cutting mechanism includes a single cutter that moves across the width of the band to cut all tapes at once, eliminating the need for separate cutters for each tape strip. This reduces device complexity while maintaining the ability to cut tapes independently through controlled activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single cutting mechanism is designed to perform the function of multiple cutters by being able to cut all tape strips simultaneously. The cutter can be activated to cut any number of tapes in the band, providing universal cutting capability across all tape positions without requiring dedicated cutters for each position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9884472B2Reduced complexity automatic fiber placement apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2018.02.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US9884472B2 patent drawing
  • US9884472B2 patent drawing
  • US9884472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a composite layup on a substrate comprises: moving an automatic fiber placement head over the substrate; using the fiber placement head to lay down multiple, parallel strips of composite tape on the substrate, including staggering the start of at least certain of the tape strips so as to form a contour pattern; and, cutting the ends of all of the tape strips using a single cut.