Fiber Stretching Device Eliminates Lower Belts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fiber stretching devices for roving frames face difficulties in adjusting and replacing lower belts due to their high number and complexity, leading to issues like excessive twisting and high maintenance downtime.

Innovation Solution

Eliminate lower belts and associated tension-regulating means, using a second motorized cylinder with increased diameter and interchangeable spacers to adjust the inclination of upper belts, allowing direct fiber pressing against support zones on the cylinder.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lower belts are used to press fibers for stretching, then fiber stretching performance is improved, but device complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber stretching performanceVSAvoidbelt system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the lower belts from the system entirely, extracting the problematic component that caused complexity. Instead of having upper and lower belts, the invention uses only upper belts that press fibers directly against the second motorized cylinder, eliminating the need for lower belts and their associated tension regulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the function of the lower belts and static track into the second motorized cylinder itself. The cylinder's surface directly serves as the support surface for fiber pressing, combining multiple components (lower belts, static track, support surface) into a single integrated element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Area of stationary object

If multiple lower belts are distributed along the roving frame, then fiber stretching coverage is improved, but replacement time and maintenance complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber stretching coverageVSAvoidbelt replacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the lower belts entirely, the patent eliminates the time-consuming replacement operation. The upper belts remain in place and continue to function without requiring periodic removal and replacement of the lower belt system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent integrates the support function into the second motorized cylinder, eliminating the need for separate lower belts that would require replacement. The cylinder itself provides the continuous support surface along the entire roving frame length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If high tension is applied to lower belts to ensure proper fiber pressing, then stretching effectiveness is improved, but risk of excessive twisting and harm to motorized cylinder increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestretching effectivenessVSAvoidexcessive twisting and harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the lower belts, the patent eliminates the source of excessive twisting forces. The upper belts press fibers directly against the cylinder without the counterbalancing lower belts that caused harmful twisting moments on the motorized cylinder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the support function into the cylinder itself, eliminating the belt system that generated harmful twisting forces. The direct contact between upper belts and cylinder surface provides controlled pressing without excessive tension buildup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Simplifies belt tension adjustment and eliminates the need for complex belt replacements, reducing twisting and maintenance time while maintaining effective fiber stretching performance.

Implementation Method 1

The upper belts press the fibers to stretch against the second motorized cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The pressing of the fibers and their dragging in increasing speed in the advancing direction causes the stretching of the fibers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3763859B1Fiber stretching device for roving frames
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 ROVIRA TRIAS JUAN
  • EP3763859B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3763859B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3763859B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Fiber stretching device for roving frames, which comprises: at least a first cylinder (1) and a second cylinder (2), both motorized, disposed in parallel in fixed positions; and a plurality of pressing arms (3), disposed in perpendicular to the motorized cylinders (1, 2) and provided with first rollers (31) and second rollers (32), both freely rotating, and upper bags (4) which embrace the corresponding freely rotating second roller (32) and support means (41) of said upper bags. The upper bags (4) press the fibers to stretch (F) directly against support zones (21) of the second motorized cylinder (2), and wherein said device does not have lower bags for the support of the upper bags (4), nor of a static track for the support of said lower bags.