Fibre-Composite Impregnation via Spreading and Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for impregnating fibre bundles with a melt suffer from high fibre damage, restricted processing velocities, and poor impregnation quality, especially with high-viscosity systems, due to high take-off forces, mechanical friction, and long residence times, which limit the use of heat-sensitive and thermally degradable materials.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a combination of fibre spreading, cross-section narrowing, deflection, and relaxation zones to achieve uniform fibre distribution and high impregnation quality, allowing for high take-off velocities and low residence times, with a device comprising a spreader device, applicator nozzles, cross-section narrowing system, deflection point, and take-off die, ensuring complete matrix penetration and minimal fibre damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple spreader devices are used to spread fibre bundles, then the spreading effectiveness is improved, but the take-off forces increase greatly and mechanical friction damages the reinforcement fibre

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespreading effectivenessVSAvoidfibre damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fibre bundle spreading process is divided into multiple stages: initial spreading in the inlet zone, further spreading through cross-section narrowing, and final distribution through deflection points. This segmented approach achieves effective spreading without requiring multiple heavy spreader devices that would increase take-off forces and fibre damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using multiple spreader devices acting in the same dimension (horizontal spreading), the invention utilizes dimensional transitions by narrowing the cross-section and introducing deflection points that spread fibres through spatial reconfiguration, achieving effective distribution with minimal mechanical force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If take-off velocity is increased to improve productivity, then production speed is improved, but the quality of impregnation decreases and fibre damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetake-off velocityVSAvoidimpregnation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fibre bundles are pre-spread and pre-positioned in the inlet zone before the actual impregnation process. This preliminary spreading action ensures that fibres are properly distributed and ready for rapid impregnation at high take-off velocities without compromising impregnation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces traditional mechanical spreading devices with a flow-based system where the melt itself, guided by cross-section narrowing and deflection points, performs the spreading and distribution function, enabling high-velocity processing without mechanical fibre damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If residence time of the polymer is reduced to prevent degradation of heat-sensitive materials, then material integrity is improved, but the effectiveness of impregnation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial integrityVSAvoidimpregnation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The impregnation process is designed as a continuous flow through the mould cross-section, with the melt continuously advancing through cross-section narrowing and deflection points. This continuous action ensures complete impregnation occurs rapidly during the short residence time, preventing polymer degradation while maintaining impregnation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The mould cross-section is designed to dynamically narrow and deflect the melt flow, creating a dynamic impregnation process that adapts to the flow velocity. At high take-off velocities, the dynamic cross-section narrowing ensures the melt remains in contact with fibres long enough for complete impregnation despite reduced residence time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If melt viscosity is increased to process higher viscosity systems, then material selection flexibility is improved, but the quality of impregnation and take-off velocity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selection flexibilityVSAvoidtake-off velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the mould cross-section (narrowing and deflection angles) to compensate for increased melt viscosity. By adjusting these geometric parameters, the system can process high-viscosity materials at high take-off velocities, maintaining both material versatility and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of curved deflection points and rounded cross-section transitions creates smooth flow paths that reduce turbulence and pressure losses for high-viscosity melts, enabling these materials to be processed at high velocities without compromising impregnation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS10576663B2Process and device for the production of a fibre-composite material
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US10576663B2 patent drawing
  • US10576663B2 patent drawing
  • US10576663B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Very good impregnation quality is achieved by a process for production of a fiber-composite material, with introducing a fiber layer by a spreader device and thus spreading to a width greater than that of the final product, at least by a factor of 1.2, where the extent of spreading of the fiber layer is such that its average thickness is 1 to 50 times the filament diameter; applying a melt by at least one applicator nozzle to the spread material; by virtue of cross-section-narrowing, the mould brings the width of the wetted fiber layer at least to the cross section with which the product leaves the take-off die; a radius then deflects the wetted fibers by an angle of 5 to 60°; a relaxation zone renders the fiber distribution more uniform to give a uniform height; achieving the first shaping by a take-off die at the end of the mould.