Fibrous cores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for fibrous cores for rolled products that offer reduced cost while maintaining sufficient strength properties, optimized for cost and strength using existing roll-forming equipment, and providing consumer awareness of branding before and after use.

Innovation Solution

A fibrous core comprising a fluted layer and a liner, where the liner has a greater basis weight than the fluted layer, both helically wound to form a core with a longitudinal axis, and featuring an adhesive on the overlap portion and indicia for branding, allowing for reduced basis weight while maintaining axial and radial strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If wall thickness is increased to improve core strength, then radial and axial strength are improved, but material cost and basis weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore strengthVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials by combining fluted paperboard with a corrugated medium layer. This composite structure provides enhanced strength properties while reducing the overall basis weight and material cost compared to using solid thick paperboard alone. The corrugated medium adds structural rigidity and crush resistance without proportionally increasing material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using fluted paperboard with varying flute configurations in different regions of the core structure. The fluting pattern provides localized reinforcement where strength is needed most (such as at the walls and flanges) while using lighter materials in less critical areas, optimizing the strength-to-cost ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If stronger plies are used to improve core strength, then radial and axial strength are improved, but material cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore strengthVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines fluted paperboard with corrugated medium to create a composite structure that achieves superior strength properties without requiring expensive high-grade solid paperboard. The composite action of the fluted structure and corrugated layer provides enhanced mechanical properties at lower material cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the core by introducing fluting depth, flute spacing, and corrugation patterns. These parameter changes allow the core to achieve higher strength-to-weight ratios by optimizing the geometric configuration rather than simply increasing material quantity or quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If paper density is increased to improve strength, then core strength is improved, but processing cost and material cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaper strengthVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fluted paperboard where the fluting creates local variations in density and structure. The paper is densified in specific regions (the flutes and liners) to provide strength where needed, while maintaining lower overall density to reduce processing costs and improve manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of fluted paperboard with corrugated medium allows the use of lower-density materials that are easier and cheaper to process, while the composite action provides the necessary strength. This avoids the need for expensive high-density paper processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Quantity of substance

If basis weight is reduced to lower cost, then material cost decreases, but core strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidcore strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the core structure by introducing fluting and corrugation patterns. These parameter changes increase the structural efficiency, allowing the core to maintain or improve strength properties while using less material (lower basis weight) and reducing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The composite fluted-corrugated structure provides high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling the use of lower basis weight materials while maintaining required core strength. The composite action maximizes the mechanical efficiency of the material used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides fibrous cores with equal or higher strength-to-basis-weight ratios compared to traditional cores, enabling cost savings and effective branding awareness, while maintaining structural integrity during handling, shipping, and storage.

Implementation Method 1

an adhesive on the overlap portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS9561929B2Fibrous cores
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US9561929B2 patent drawing
  • US9561929B2 patent drawing
  • US9561929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a fibrous core comprising a fluted layer; and a liner disposed on the fluted layer. The fluted layer and the liner are helically wound defining a longitudinal core axis.