Field Device Commissioning With Identifier Translation Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for commissioning field devices in industrial control systems fail to verify that the correct field device is connected to the appropriate I/O port, leading to potential miscommunication and miscontrol, which can result in unintended or catastrophic consequences, especially in large-scale industrial settings.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that detect field device connections, retrieve identifiers, and use translation data to compare physical device tags with system tags, initiating alerts and rectification actions to ensure correct device placement and configuration, utilizing a server and I/O ports to verify and correct field device connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional commissioning methods are used without verification, then commissioning process is simple and fast, but reliability of field device connection is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield device connection reliabilityVSAvoidcommissioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by detecting field device connections and comparing device identifiers against configuration data before commissioning proceeds. This advance checking ensures correct device-I/O port mapping, preventing miscommunication and miscontrol issues that would otherwise require complex troubleshooting later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring field device connections, retrieving device identifiers, comparing them with expected configuration data, and generating alerts when mismatches are detected. This closed-loop verification process maintains connection reliability without requiring complex manual verification procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If field device connections are not verified, then commissioning time is reduced, but operational errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommissioning speedVSAvoiddevice configuration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-verification by automatically detecting field device connections, retrieving device identifiers from the devices themselves, and comparing them against stored configuration data. This automated self-check process maintains high commissioning speed while ensuring configuration accuracy, eliminating the need for slow manual verification methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical verification methods with electronic detection and automated comparison systems. By using electronic identifier retrieval and automated matching algorithms, the system achieves both fast commissioning speeds and high configuration accuracy, substituting complex manual procedures with simple automated electronic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If connection verification is implemented, then miscommunication risk is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential verification function—comparing device identifiers against configuration data—separating it from the overall commissioning process. This focused approach ensures communication reliability by verifying device-I/O port mapping without requiring complex comprehensive system verification, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining essential safety checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If device identifier comparison is performed, then correct device placement is ensured, but commissioning time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice placement precisionVSAvoidcommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual device verification with automated electronic identifier comparison. The system electronically retrieves device identifiers and automatically compares them against configuration data, achieving precise device placement verification instantaneously rather than through slow manual checking procedures, thus maintaining high precision while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11243514B2Methods, systems and computer program products for commissioning field devices in a control system
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11243514B2 patent drawing
  • US11243514B2 patent drawing
  • US11243514B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention enables commissioning of field devices within a control system by implementing the steps of (i) detecting a connection event comprising a field device interfacing with an I/O port that is communicably coupled with the server, (ii) retrieving from a memory of the field device that is interfacing with the I/O port, a first field device identifier corresponding to the field device, (iii) retrieving from a non-transient memory database communicably coupled with the server, field device configuration data associated with the I/O port, wherein, the set of field device attributes includes a second field device identifier, and at least a segment of the second field device identifier is different from a corresponding segment of the first field device identifier, (iv) generating one of a translated first field device identifier and a translated second field device identifier, based on predefined translation data, (v) comparing the translated first field device identifier with the second field device identifier, or comparing the first field device identifier with the translated second field device identifier, (vi) generating a connection check output decision based on an output of the comparison, and (vii) optionally, initiate a connection check output event based on the connection check output decision.