Autonomous Field Path Planning for Variable Working Widths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for generating path plans for autonomous agricultural vehicles are cumbersome, requiring manual operator input and relying on historical data that may not be applicable to different implements, leading to inaccurate or unsuccessful path generation, especially when the working width changes.

Innovation Solution

The system generates a path plan based on real-time coverage data, independent of the implement's working width, by using sensors to determine the vehicle's geographical location, speed, and direction, and adjusts the path to ensure complete field coverage, including turns within the field boundary, while calculating the cost of the path plan to select the most efficient route.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual operator input and historical data are used to generate path plans, then the system is simpler to implement, but the path generation accuracy deteriorates when working width changes or different implements are used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath generation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates path plans using real-time sensor data from the vehicle's own operation, eliminating the need for manual operator input and historical data storage. The vehicle self-monitors its geographical location, speed, and direction to create accurate path plans adapted to current working conditions and implement specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts path plan parameters based on real-time sensor measurements of the vehicle's actual performance and environmental conditions. This allows the path generation algorithm to adapt to different implements and working widths by using current operational data rather than fixed historical parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If real-time sensor data is used to generate path plans, then path generation accuracy improves, but the amount of data processing and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath generation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential real-time parameters needed for path planning (geographical location, speed, direction) from the vehicle's sensor suite, processing only the critical data required for accurate path generation while filtering out unnecessary information to minimize computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes sensor data streams to identify and prioritize critical path-related parameters before feeding them into the path planning algorithm, reducing the computational burden by preparing only the necessary data elements in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If conventional methods relying on historical data are used, then the system is more adaptable to different implements, but the path generation becomes cumbersome and requires manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to different implements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adapts to different implements by using real-time sensor data from the vehicle's own operation, eliminating the need for manual reconfiguration or historical data updates. The vehicle self-adjusts its path planning based on current implement specifications and working conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors real-time vehicle performance and environmental conditions through sensors, using this feedback to dynamically adjust path plans for different implements. This closed-loop approach ensures the system remains adaptable without requiring manual intervention or historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If manual operator input is required for path planning, then less computational resources are needed, but operator fatigue increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle autonomously generates and follows path plans using its own sensor data, completely eliminating the need for manual operator input for path planning. This self-service capability increases productivity by allowing continuous operation without operator fatigue while managing automation complexity through efficient use of onboard sensors and processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11914379B2Methods and apparatus to generate a path plan
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 DEERE & CO
  • US11914379B2 patent drawing
  • US11914379B2 patent drawing
  • US11914379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems and articles of manufacture are disclosed to generate a path plan. An example method includes generating guidance lines for a next path of a vehicle based on an edge of a current path, generating a first path plan of a field within a field boundary, the first path plan generated using a first degree heading, generating a second path plan of the field within the field boundary, the second path plan generated using a second degree heading, and when the first path plan includes a first cost lower than a second cost of the second path plan, transmitting the first path plan to a vehicle to control the vehicle.