Fieldbus Self-Recovery for Fast Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In process control systems, diagnosing and correcting issues with smart field devices and process control loops can be time-consuming, often requiring technicians to physically travel to the devices and may necessitate manufacturer support, leading to costly delays and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing self-recovery capabilities in Fieldbus field devices, which allow them to autonomously detect errors and perform recovery operations with operator authorization, reducing the need for manual intervention and minimizing communication through bandwidth-constrained process communication loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual intervention is used to diagnose and correct field device errors, then accuracy of error correction is improved, but time consumption and operator effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of error correctionVSAvoidtime consumption for error diagnosis and correction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The field device is equipped with self-recovery capabilities that enable it to autonomously diagnose errors, select appropriate recovery methods, and execute correction operations without requiring manual intervention from operators or technicians, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining correction accuracy through pre-programmed diagnostic and recovery algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple recovery methods are pre-configured and stored in the field device's memory before errors occur. When an error is detected, the device can immediately execute the appropriate pre-prepared recovery method without requiring real-time human decision-making, thus reducing diagnosis and correction time while ensuring accurate error handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If technicians physically travel to field device locations for error diagnosis, then comprehensive diagnostic capability is improved, but operational efficiency and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive diagnostic capabilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The field device autonomously performs comprehensive diagnostics and error correction without requiring physical presence of technicians, using onboard sensors, processors, and pre-stored diagnostic algorithms to detect, analyze, and resolve errors remotely, thereby maintaining diagnostic capability while significantly improving operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The physical travel and manual diagnostic processes are replaced by electronic self-diagnostics and automated recovery operations embedded in the field device, substituting mechanical human intervention with electronic automated systems that achieve the same diagnostic goals without requiring technician displacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manufacturer support is called for error resolution, then expertise and accuracy of recovery are improved, but time consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpertise in error recoveryVSAvoidtime for external support coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The field device incorporates built-in expert recovery capabilities with multiple pre-programmed recovery methods for various error conditions, enabling it to autonomously execute expert-level diagnostics and corrections without requiring external manufacturer support, thereby eliminating coordination time while maintaining high recovery accuracy through pre-configured expert algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If self-recovery operations are implemented autonomously, then productivity and response time are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror recovery speedVSAvoidcomplexity of self-recovery mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple recovery methods and diagnostic algorithms are pre-configured and stored in the field device's memory during manufacturing. The device simply needs to detect the error type and execute the appropriate pre-prepared recovery sequence, which improves productivity without requiring complex real-time decision-making logic or increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3202066B1Field device with self-recovery
Publication Date: 2023.05.17 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT LLLP
  • EP3202066B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3202066B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3202066B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A field device includes a controller and a process communication module. The controller is configured to perform at least one operation related to process control and is also configured to perform at least one self-recovery operation relative to the field device. The process communication module is coupled to the controller and is configured to couple to a process communication segment and communicate in accordance with a process communication protocol. The controller is configured to detect an erroneous condition and selectively apply the at least one self-recovery operation in response to the detected erroneous condition.