Electronic File Backup Prioritization via Value-Based Heuristics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

End users face challenges in effectively prioritizing and backing up important electronic files due to hardware failures, loss, theft, and malicious threats, leading to potential data loss, as existing backup systems lack a method to differentiate and prioritize files based on their value to the user.

Innovation Solution

A technology that prioritizes electronic files for backup based on their defined value to the user, using heuristic definitions and rules to assign backup priorities, ensuring more valuable files such as work products are backed up first, by analyzing file properties and user interaction behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all electronic files are backed up with equal priority, then the backup system is simple to implement, but valuable files may not be protected in a timely manner during network bandwidth constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protection effectivenessVSAvoidbackup system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different backup priorities to different files based on their individual characteristics (file type, modification recency, size). This local differentiation allows valuable files to be prioritized while less critical files receive lower priority, resolving the contradiction between reliable data protection and system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of backup priority from a uniform value to a variable value determined by multiple factors including file type, modification time, and file size. This parameter transformation enables dynamic prioritization that improves data protection effectiveness without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If backup priority is determined by multiple file characteristics, then valuable files are protected more effectively, but the complexity of determining backup order increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority-based data protectionVSAvoidfile value assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the file value assessment into distinct, measurable characteristics: file type classification, modification recency detection, and size evaluation. Each characteristic is assessed independently using clear criteria, making the overall prioritization process more manageable and less complex than holistic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from file metadata (modification timestamps, file type information, size data) to automatically determine backup priority. This feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously assess and adjust prioritization based on objective file characteristics without requiring complex manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If manual file prioritization is required, then backup accuracy can be high, but user time and effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefile importance identification accuracyVSAvoiduser time investment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service prioritization where the backup system automatically determines file priorities based on objective characteristics like file type, modification recency, and size. This eliminates the need for manual user intervention while maintaining high accuracy in identifying valuable files, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of file characteristics automatically before backup operations begin. By pre-evaluating file types, modification timestamps, and sizes, the system establishes backup priorities in advance without requiring user time during the actual backup process, achieving both accuracy and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If backup operations run continuously, then data protection is maximized, but network bandwidth and system resources are过度 consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous data protectionVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic backup operations triggered by file system events (creation, modification, deletion) rather than continuous monitoring. This event-driven periodic action provides effective data protection by capturing all changes while consuming network bandwidth only when necessary, resolving the contradiction between continuous protection and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by prioritizing backup of only the most valuable files during each backup cycle rather than backing up all files equally. This selective approach ensures critical data protection while reducing overall network bandwidth consumption, achieving an optimal balance between reliability and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10983873B1Prioritizing electronic backup
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10983873B1 patent drawing
  • US10983873B1 patent drawing
  • US10983873B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A technology is described for prioritizing electronic files for backup to a backup storage. An example method may include determining a defined file value of an electronic file identified for backup to a backup storage. A backup priority may be assigned to the electronic file based in part on the defined file value of the electronic file, and a backup entry for the electronic file may be added to a backup queue. Thereafter, the backup entry for the electronic file may be retrieved from the backup queue, wherein the backup priority for the electronic file may be higher as compared to backup priorities of other electronic files represented by backup entries in the backup queue, and a copy of the electronic file represented by the backup entry in the backup queue may be sent to the backup storage.