File Handler Disassociates Prefetch and Read Streams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deduplication storage systems face inefficiencies in restoring small files due to the lack of prefetch advantages and strict in-order processing of Quality of Service (QoS) operations, leading to slow restoration performance and manual prioritization errors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a queue-based mechanism through extended Data Domain APIs to disassociate prefetch streams from read streams, allowing for prioritization and efficient processing of small file restores by routing read requests through a queue processor and utilizing multiple threads for optimized I/O operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single read request issues a single prefetch request at a fixed offset, then the prefetch mechanism is simple to implement, but small file restoration performance deteriorates because prefetch advantages are not obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprefetch mechanism complexityVSAvoidsmall file restoration performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prefetch mechanism into multiple independent prefetch requests, each targeting different offsets within the read-ahead cache. Instead of a single prefetch at a fixed offset, the system issues multiple prefetch requests with varying offsets to improve hit probability for small files while maintaining manageable complexity through structured offset calculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-calculating and issuing multiple prefetch requests before the actual read operation. The system determines optimal prefetch offsets in advance and issues these prefetch requests to the storage system, ensuring that data is ready when needed without waiting for sequential reads to complete

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If strict in-order processing is used for prefetch operations, then processing is straightforward and reliable, but Quality of Service operations become problematic and cannot prioritize certain backup files

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing reliabilityVSAvoidQoS prioritization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing pipeline into separate prefetch processing and read processing streams. The prefetch stream handles data retrieval independently, while the read stream handles actual data requests. This segmentation allows QoS algorithms to operate on the read stream without interfering with prefetch operations, enabling prioritization while maintaining processing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary queue structure that mediates between prefetch operations and read operations. This queue allows out-of-order processing by buffering prefetch results and delivering them to read requests in the appropriate order, enabling QoS prioritization while maintaining data integrity and processing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual prioritization is used to restore specific backup files, then QoS control is achieved, but the process becomes error-prone and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup file prioritizationVSAvoidprioritization operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the storage system to automatically apply QoS policies and prioritize backup file restoration without manual intervention. The system reads prioritization rules from configuration data and autonomously determines the restoration order, eliminating manual prioritization operations while maintaining accurate QoS control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors restoration progress and adjusts processing priorities based on QoS policies. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically prioritize critical backup files and optimize restoration operations without requiring manual reconfiguration or intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11829262B2File restore performance using a file handler to disassociate prefetch and read streams
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 DELL PROD LP
  • US11829262B2 patent drawing
  • US11829262B2 patent drawing
  • US11829262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of small file restore process in deduplication file system wherein restoration requires issuing a read request within an I/O request to the file system. The process places the files in a prefetch queue such that a combined size of the files meets or exceeds a size of the prefetch queue as defined by a prefetch horizon. A file handler disassociates prefetch streams from read streams. The handler prefetches the read operations and stores them in memory. The stream corresponding to a read will only open as the read requests hit the queue processor. As a result, the stream usage is very low, since the I/O, worker threads and the read streams are disassociated from each other.