Filling Station Valve Timing Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packaging machines face challenges in maintaining high performance over time due to varying product properties and mechanical component uniqueness, leading to inefficiencies in filling processes and potential package integrity issues.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive and dynamic method for adjusting parameter settings of a filling station in a packaging machine, using sensors to determine actuation time points for inlet and outlet valves based on threshold values, allowing for individualized and time-varying calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If packaging machines are highly automated to increase production rates, then productivity increases, but the complexity of control and functioning of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect actual valve positions and piston movements, then feeds this information back to the control unit. The control unit compares actual positions with commanded positions and automatically adjusts timing parameters to compensate for deviations, enabling self-correction without increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automatic calibration and adaptation of timing parameters without requiring manual intervention. The control unit autonomously determines optimal actuation time points by analyzing sensor data from multiple filling cycles, allowing the machine to self-optimize its performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If calibration is performed to optimize filling performance, then manufacturing precision improves, but the calibration process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling accuracyVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal actuation time points by analyzing sensor data from multiple filling cycles. The control unit performs calibration computations autonomously without requiring manual intervention or specialized calibration procedures, simplifying the process while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs timing adjustments based on preliminary analysis of valve and piston behavior. By determining actuation time points in advance through automated analysis of sensor data from initial filling cycles, the system prepares optimal parameters before production begins, reducing the need for complex ongoing calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If individualized calibration is performed for each packaging machine, then reliability improves, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistencyVSAvoidcalibration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each packaging machine automatically performs its own individualized calibration by analyzing sensor data from its specific components. The control unit autonomously determines machine-specific actuation time points without requiring manual calibration procedures, maintaining reliability while simplifying operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors monitoring actual valve and piston behavior to automatically adapt timing parameters for each specific machine. This automated feedback mechanism ensures individualized optimization without requiring manual intervention, making the system both reliable and easy to operate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of valve timing is performed, then adaptability to product variations improves, but productivity decreases due to slower speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to product propertiesVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adapts to different product properties by analyzing sensor data from sensors monitoring valve positions and piston movements. The control unit uses this feedback to automatically adjust timing parameters for each filling cycle, providing adaptability equivalent to manual adjustment but at full machine speed without reducing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical adjustment of valve timing with an automated electronic control system. Sensors and control units automatically detect and compensate for timing variations based on product properties, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining adaptability and preserving high production rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4538185A1A method for adjusting parameter settings for a filling station in a packaging machine
Publication Date: 2025.04.16 TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA
  • EP4538185A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4538185A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP4538185A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method (300) for adjusting parameter settings for a filling station (106) in a packaging machine (100), wherein the filling station (106) comprises: a pump (200) comprising a hollow body (202), an inlet valve (204a), an outlet valve (204b) and a piston (206). The method (300) comprising: obtaining (S302), via one or more sensors, sensor data relating to the inlet valve (204a) and the outlet valve (204b) respectively, wherein the sensor data is indicative of a position and/or speed of the inlet valve (204a) and the outlet valve (204b); identifying (S304) a first point in time at which the sensor data indicates that the position and/or speed of the inlet valve (204a) reaches a first threshold value; identifying (S306) a second point in time at which the sensor data indicates that the position and/or speed of the outlet valve (204b) reaches a second threshold value; identifying (S308) a third point in time at which a movement of the piston (106) between a volume-reducing position and a volume-increasing position is started; based on a comparison between the first and third point in time, and a comparison between the second and third point in time, determining (S310) an actuation time point of the inlet valve (204a) and/or an actuation time point of the outlet valve (204b); and updating (S312) the parameter settings used by a control unit (112) of the filling station (106) based on the actuation time point determined for the inlet valve (204a) and/or the actuation time point determined for the outlet valve (204b).