Processing Container Replacement Timing From Film-Etch Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing substrate processing apparatuses face issues with over-etching of processing containers due to frequent cleaning, leading to accelerated replacement times based on cleaning cycles rather than actual film accumulation, which affects throughput efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A substrate processing apparatus equipped with a controller that calculates the difference between cumulative film thickness and estimated etching amount to determine the optimal replacement time of the processing container, allowing for accurate timing of maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the processing container is cleaned for each support to remove accumulated film, then the film accumulation on supports is controlled, but the processing container is over-etched and replacement time is accelerated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm accumulation controlVSAvoidprocessing container lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller calculates the cumulative film thickness on the processing container inner wall and compares it with a threshold value to determine when cleaning is actually needed, rather than cleaning after every support usage. This feedback mechanism prevents unnecessary cleaning operations that cause over-etching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing full cleaning operations after every support usage (excessive action), the system performs cleaning only when the cumulative film thickness reaches a threshold (partial action), thereby avoiding unnecessary damage to the processing container while still maintaining film accumulation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If multiple supports are operated for one processing container to improve throughput, then substrate processing efficiency increases, but the frequency of cleaning operations increases leading to over-etching

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocessing container lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system tracks the cumulative film thickness on the processing container across multiple support operations and only triggers cleaning when the threshold is reached, allowing multiple supports to be processed without proportionally increasing cleaning frequency and thus preserving container lifespan while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller preliminarily calculates the cumulative film thickness before initiating cleaning operations, allowing the system to plan cleaning schedules in advance based on actual accumulation rates rather than reacting to each individual support completion, thereby reducing unnecessary cleaning interruptions to throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If cleaning operations are performed frequently to maintain processing container cleanliness, then film accumulation is controlled, but the replacement time of the processing container is accelerated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleanliness maintenanceVSAvoidprocessing container replacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from cumulative film thickness measurements to determine when cleaning is actually necessary, replacing cleaning operations from a fixed frequent schedule to a need-based schedule, thereby maintaining cleanliness reliability while reducing unnecessary cleaning cycles that accelerate replacement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning operation frequency is changed from a fixed parameter (cleaning after every support) to a dynamic parameter based on cumulative film thickness, allowing the system to maintain cleanliness standards while adapting cleaning frequency to actual contamination levels, thus extending processing container life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise determination of processing container replacement, enhancing throughput by minimizing unnecessary replacements and extending the usable life of the container.

Implementation Method 1

a gas supplier configured to supply a processing gas depositing a deposit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

a gas supplier configured to supply a processing gas depositing a deposit, and a cleaning gas removing the deposit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250223703A1Substrate processing apparatus, method of manufacturing semiconductor device, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 KOKUSAI DENKI KK
  • US20250223703A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223703A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique includes a substrate processing apparatus comprising: a processing container that processes a substrate; a gas supplier for supplying a processing gas depositing a deposit, and a cleaning gas removing the deposit into the processing chamber, a controller, wherein the controller is configured to control the gas supplier so as to perform, a predetermined times, processing including: (a) forming the deposit on the substrate and the inner side of the processing container; and (b) removing the deposit on the inner side of the processing container. The controller is configured to calculate a difference between a lifetime cumulative film thickness value, which is a cumulative value of a thickness of the deposit in (a), and a cumulative etching amount, which is an amount of a thickness of the deposit estimated to be removed in (b), and obtaining a replacement time of the processing container on the basis of the difference.