In-Situ Filter Certification Valve Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for in-situ filter certification in containment systems require facility shutdown and decontamination, which are costly and time-consuming, leading to significant downtime and increased costs due to lost research or production time.

Innovation Solution

A containment system with a housing having airflow inlet and outlet apertures, a filter mounting portion, and valve assemblies that allow for in-situ testing of filters without decontaminating the system, enabling the use of aerosol challenges and sample collection without opening the housing, and subsequent decontamination of test equipment after testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the containment system is decontaminated and isolated from upstream ductwork before filter testing, then safe in-situ testing is enabled, but facility shutdown and decontamination cause significant downtime and increased costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting safetyVSAvoidfacility downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into isolated test sections with individual valve assemblies that can be independently controlled. This allows testing to be performed in segregated zones without requiring complete system shutdown or decontamination, resolving the contradiction between ensuring testing safety and minimizing facility downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Valve assemblies act as intermediaries between the containment system and test equipment, enabling controlled isolation and connection. These intermediaries allow safe testing operations without requiring full system decontamination, thus maintaining safety while reducing downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the containment system is decontaminated before testing, then hazardous particle contamination is removed, but decontamination agents and time are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazardous particle contaminationVSAvoiddecontamination agent usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The test sections are physically isolated from the main containment system through valve assemblies. This extraction allows testing to occur in separated zones, eliminating the need to decontaminate the entire containment system and thereby reducing decontamination agent consumption while still removing hazardous particles from test areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The containment system is segmented into isolated test sections that can be independently managed. This segmentation allows hazardous particles to be contained and removed only from specific test zones rather than the entire system, reducing decontamination agent usage while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the facility is shut down for filter certification, then thorough decontamination can be performed, but research or production time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination thoroughnessVSAvoidresearch or production output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into isolated test sections that can be independently tested without shutting down the entire facility. This segmentation enables thorough decontamination and testing of specific filter sections while other parts of the facility continue operating, maintaining decontamination reliability while preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve assemblies enable continuous operation of the facility by allowing isolated testing and decontamination of test sections. Other parts of the facility can continue their useful actions without interruption, resolving the contradiction between thorough decontamination and maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and cost-effective filter certification without shutting down the facility, reducing decontamination agent usage and minimizing downtime, allowing for continuous operational activities and reduced costs.

Implementation Method 1

injecting an aerosol challenge upstream of the filter at a known concentration, flowing the aerosol laden air through the filter typically at an operational flow rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerosol flow:

Implementation Method 2

A first valve assembly having a first port coupled to the upstream sample port, a second port, and a third port. A second valve assembly having a first port coupled to one of the downstream sample ports, a second port, and a third port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve flow control:

Data Source

PatentEP2188034B1Method and apparatus for in-situ testing of filtration systems
Publication Date: 2014.07.30 CAMFIL USA INC
  • EP2188034B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2188034B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2188034B1 patent drawingFigure 2B~2C

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention generally provide an apparatus and method for certifying a filter in a containment system without decontaminating the containment system prior to certification. The apparatus generally comprises a valve assembly selectable between at least three operational states. A first state prevents flow from prevents flow through a port of a housing. A second state fluidly couples the port to test equipment necessary to test a filter disposed within the housing. A third state seals the port but fluidly couples the test equipment to a decontamination system.