Bandpass Filter Chain Bandwidth Penalty Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-frequency optical communication systems face challenges in designing and testing due to increased bandwidth requirements, which limit the use of denser channel spacing and filter cascades, and existing methods for estimating workability are impractical or provide insufficiently precise results.

Innovation Solution

Selecting a worst-case filter and testing or simulating the system with this filter to determine bandwidth narrowing effects, using criteria such as bandwidth limiting penalty to ensure the system operates within predetermined limits, allowing for the estimation of the workability of high bit rate communication systems with chains of bandpass filters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If advanced modulation formats are used to increase noise tolerance, then system reach is improved, but bandwidth requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise toleranceVSAvoidbandwidth requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of modulation format to achieve better noise tolerance while managing bandwidth requirements. By selecting appropriate modulation formats and adjusting system parameters, the patent resolves the contradiction between improving reliability through advanced modulation and controlling the resulting bandwidth increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If denser channel spacing is used, then system capacity increases, but filter bandwidth limitations prevent further densification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidfilter bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the optical spectrum into multiple channels with specific spacing. By carefully segmenting the bandwidth and using appropriate filter designs for each channel, the system achieves high capacity while respecting individual filter bandwidth limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal filter design that can handle multiple channels and different modulation formats. This multi-functional filter approach allows denser channel spacing while maintaining performance across various system configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple cascades of DCMs and ROADMs are deployed for flexibility, then network adaptability improves, but system bandwidth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork flexibilityVSAvoidsystem bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic filter designs that can adapt their characteristics based on system requirements. The filters can adjust their bandwidth and center frequency to accommodate different network configurations, maintaining flexibility while preserving bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes filter parameters such as bandwidth, center frequency, and shape factor to optimize performance in cascaded configurations. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves both network flexibility and adequate bandwidth preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If laboratory testing of complete systems is performed, then measurement accuracy improves, but cost and deployment time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkability estimation accuracyVSAvoidoptical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential filtering characteristics from complex cascaded systems and represents them using equivalent single-filter models. This extraction approach maintains measurement accuracy while dramatically reducing the number of physical components needed for testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified mathematical models that copy the behavior of complex filter cascades. These models replicate the bandwidth limiting effects without requiring physical implementation of all components, reducing cost and deployment time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

5Loss of time

If mathematical simulation is used to model system operation, then deployment time decreases, but result precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment timeVSAvoidsimulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of filter components to establish accurate parameters for mathematical models. By pre-measuring and storing filter characteristics, the simulation achieves high precision without requiring time-consuming real-time measurements during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8412039B2Method for estimating bandwidth limiting effects in high frequency transmission communication systems
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 ECI TELECOM LTD
  • US8412039B2 patent drawing
  • US8412039B2 patent drawing
  • US8412039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for estimating a bandwidth limiting penalty of a chain of bandpass optical filters in an optical telecommunication system. The method is advantageous for systems carrying an optical signal at a bit rate of about 10 Gb/s, wherein average bandwidth of the filters in the chain is of the same order of magnitude as bandwidth of the optical signal. The method comprises selecting a worst case filter, checking the system by testing and/or simulating it as being provided with the selected worst case filter instead of the chain of filters, and then judging about the bandwidth limiting penalty of the chain of filters based on results of the checking.