Systems and methods to detect dirt level of filters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining when to replace air or water filters in commercial buildings are either costly due to premature replacement or inefficient due to unreliable sensor readings, leading to increased energy expenses and potential health risks from poor indoor air quality.

Innovation Solution

A system using multiple sensors to monitor the efficiency of filters, collecting and processing data to create a filter curve over time, which predicts when a filter needs replacement based on differential pressure and flow rates, while considering labor and equipment costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If filters are replaced on a fixed schedule, then filter replacement is simple and reliable, but extra hardware and labor costs are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter replacement reliabilityVSAvoidhardware and labor costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed-time replacement to condition-based replacement by continuously monitoring differential pressure across the filter. The controller compares real-time DP readings against threshold values to dynamically determine when replacement is actually needed, changing the replacement parameter from time-based to condition-based decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The filter replacement system becomes self-monitoring and self-deciding through automated sensor detection and controller logic. The system automatically tracks filter condition, determines when replacement is necessary, and can trigger alerts or scheduling without human intervention, making the replacement process autonomous and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of substance

If filters are replaced less frequently to save costs, then hardware and labor costs decrease, but energy expenses increase and health may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware and labor costsVSAvoidindoor air quality and health risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of differential pressure across the filter. The controller receives real-time DP data from sensors, processes this information, and automatically determines when the filter has reached a state requiring replacement. This closed-loop feedback ensures filters are replaced based on actual condition rather than arbitrary schedules, preventing both premature and delayed replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual, schedule-based filter replacement system is replaced with an automated electronic monitoring and decision system. Sensors continuously measure differential pressure, and a controller processes this data to automatically determine replacement timing, substituting mechanical/time-based replacement with intelligent, condition-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If differential pressure threshold is used to determine filter replacement, then replacement timing is objective, but sensor data noises make readings untrustable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter dirt level detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor reading reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and noise filtering on sensor readings before making replacement decisions. The controller incorporates logic to distinguish between actual filter clogging (sustained DP increase) and temporary fluctuations (noise spikes), using time-based validation and threshold comparison to ensure readings are trustworthy before triggering replacement alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach accurately determines the optimal filter replacement date, minimizing unnecessary replacements and energy waste, thereby reducing costs and ensuring healthier indoor air quality.

Implementation Method 1

monitor the efficiency of the dirty side or input of a filter and the output side of a filter... based on differential pressure between the different sides of the filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential pressure measurement: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11009246B2Systems and methods to detect dirt level of filters
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • US11009246B2 patent drawing
  • US11009246B2 patent drawing
  • US11009246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach that collects sensor data associated with a building automation system having filters and determining the optimal timing of the replacement of filters that includes replacement dates based upon use, utility, and labor costs.