Filter Muffler Radial Damping Diffuser Pressure Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional filter silencers for exhaust gas turbochargers face challenges in achieving optimal sound attenuation, particularly at high flow velocities, and require significant installation space while causing pressure losses.

Innovation Solution

A filter silencer design featuring a front element, rear element, and radially arranged damping elements with diffuser elements having a downstream taper, forming a flow channel with an increasing cross section, and involute contours to reduce pressure losses and enhance damping properties, allowing for a more compact installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional filter silencers are used, then sound attenuation is achieved, but installation space is large and pressure losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound attenuationVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The filter element is integrated within the silencer housing, with damping elements arranged radially around the central flow channel. This nested configuration allows the filter and silencer functions to occupy the same spatial envelope, reducing overall installation space while maintaining both filtration and sound attenuation performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping elements are arranged radially around the central flow channel, utilizing the radial dimension to create sound-absorbing pathways without increasing axial length. This dimensional approach allows effective sound attenuation within a compact cylindrical volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional filter silencers are used, then sound attenuation is achieved, but pressure losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound attenuationVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The diffuser elements are positioned specifically at the downstream ends of the damping elements, creating localized flow management zones. This local quality enhancement allows smooth flow transitions in critical areas while maintaining compact overall dimensions, reducing pressure losses without compromising sound attenuation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The flow channel cross-section increases in the downstream direction due to the tapered diffuser elements, changing the flow parameters gradually. This parameter change approach reduces flow velocity and pressure losses while maintaining effective sound attenuation across the damping elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of stationary object

If damping elements are arranged radially, then compact design is achieved, but flow channel design becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidflow channel design
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diffuser elements feature a downstream taper with a specific angle range (5° to 15°), creating smooth curved transitions in the flow channel. This curvature approach simplifies the flow path design while maintaining compact radial arrangement, reducing pressure losses without significantly increasing design complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The silencer is divided into a front element, rear element, and multiple radially arranged damping elements with diffuser elements. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall simplicity, reducing manufacturing and design complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces pressure losses and improves damping performance, enabling a more compact and efficient filter silencer that minimizes sound attenuation issues at high flow velocities.

Implementation Method 1

Each downstream end has a diffuser element with a downstream taper, with an angle α between two opposite sides of the diffuser element, in particular the downstream taper, being selected from a range of 5° ≤ α ≤ 15°, such that the flow channel has an increasing flow cross-section on the downstream side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

Sound attenuation occurs dissipatively at the damping elements, with the sound energy being directly converted into heat by porous or fibrous absorption materials, which essentially comprise the damping elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentEP3737850B1Filter muffler for an exhaust gas turbocharger of an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2024.09.18 ACCELLERON SWITZERLAND LTD
  • EP3737850B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3737850B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3737850B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a filter muffler (10) comprising a front element (11), a rear element (12), and a plurality of damping elements (20) which are arranged between the front element (11) and the rear element (12). The damping elements (20) are arranged radially about a central axis (16) of the filter muffler such that a flow channel (30) is formed between each pair of adjacent damping elements. The respective downstream ends (22) of the damping elements (20) each have a diffuser element (23) which has a downstream tapering. An angle α between two opposing sides of the diffuser element (23) is selected from a range of 1° ≤α ≤ 8°.