Filtering Management System for Notification Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to optimally manage user interruptions by not prioritizing incoming messages based on the user's concentration level and the importance of the content, leading to reduced productivity and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A filtering management system that analyzes user concentration levels and the importance of incoming content using sensors, natural language processing, and machine learning to determine the optimal time for delivering notifications, ensuring only important content interrupts the user during focused tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If notifications are delivered at the time of delivery without prioritization, then all incoming content is transmitted to the user, but user productivity decreases due to distractions from unimportant content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser productivityVSAvoiddistractions from notifications
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a filtering management system as an intermediary between incoming notifications and the user. This system analyzes both the user's concentration level (derived from workflow data) and the importance of incoming content, then selectively delivers notifications. The filter acts as a mediator that prevents harmful distractions while ensuring important communications reach the user, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining productivity and delivering all notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the delivery parameter of notifications based on two variables: user concentration level and content importance. When concentration is high and content is low-importance, delivery is delayed or blocked. When concentration is low or content is high-importance, delivery is permitted. This parameter-based filtering resolves the contradiction by adapting notification delivery to contextual conditions rather than applying a static all-or-nothing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If do-not-disturb settings or calendar-based restrictions are used, then user interruption is reduced, but important notifications may still be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker productivityVSAvoidmissed important notifications
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances traditional do-not-disturb settings by introducing dynamic parameter changes based on content importance analysis. Instead of a static block, the system evaluates each incoming notification's importance score and compares it against the user's current concentration state. Important notifications automatically override do-not-disturb restrictions, ensuring critical information is delivered while maintaining productivity during focused work periods. This resolves the contradiction by making the filtering system adaptive rather than rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the filtering management continuously monitors both user workflow patterns and incoming notification characteristics. By analyzing the importance of notifications and adjusting delivery decisions based on this feedback, the system learns to distinguish between interruptive and important communications. This feedback mechanism ensures that do-not-disturb settings become increasingly accurate at preserving productivity while preventing important information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If a filtering system analyzes user concentration and content importance, then notification delivery is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser productivityVSAvoidfiltering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filtering management system operates autonomously by self-analyzing workflow data to determine user concentration levels and self-evaluating incoming content importance using natural language processing. The system serves itself by making delivery decisions without requiring constant user configuration or manual intervention. This self-service capability reduces the operational complexity burden on users while maintaining sophisticated filtering logic, thereby resolving the contradiction between optimized delivery and perceived system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal filtering management system that handles multiple notification types (emails, messages, alerts) across various applications through a single integrated platform. The system performs multiple functions: analyzing workflow data, evaluating content importance, determining optimal delivery timing, and managing do-not-disturb settings. By consolidating these functions into one multi-functional system rather than separate tools for each task, the patent reduces overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive productivity optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12081504B2Systems and methods for processing user concentration levels for workflow management
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12081504B2 patent drawing
  • US12081504B2 patent drawing
  • US12081504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for processing user data are disclosed. A system may include a memory storing instructions and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations. The operations may include receiving, from a sensor, first user data associated with a client device; receiving, from a filter model, feature data corresponding to the first user data, the feature data comprising at least one of workflow information, system messages, or email addresses; training a meta-model to predict the first user data based on the feature data; generating a meta-model output based on the filter model and the feature data; updating the filter model based on the meta-model output; and transmitting the updated filter model to the client device.