Filtration Element Outer Permeate Tube Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional filtration systems with central permeate collecting tubes face issues with uneven pressure distribution, reduced filtering effect, and ineffective backwashing due to trapped air pockets and fouling layer buildup, leading to decreased performance and increased contamination risks.

Innovation Solution

The filtration system arranges the permeate collecting tube in an outer part of the filtration element, ensuring even pressure distribution across the membrane during filtration and backwashing modes, and incorporates a multi-bore membrane with a perforated tube for enhanced stability and flow distribution, allowing for improved ventilation and fouling removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a central permeate collecting tube is used in conventional filtration systems, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the pressure distribution becomes uneven and the filtering effect is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidfiltering effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single central permeate collecting tube is segmented into multiple outer permeate collecting tubes distributed around the periphery of the membrane element. This segmentation allows permeate to be collected from multiple locations simultaneously, creating even pressure distribution across the membrane surface and preventing the localized pressure buildup that occurs with a central collection point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The permeate collection approach transitions from a single-point (central axis) collection to a distributed multi-point collection around the periphery. This dimensional redistribution of collection points transforms the pressure distribution pattern from radial concentration to uniform circumferential distribution, improving filtration effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a central permeate collecting tube is used, then the device complexity is low, but air pockets become trapped and backwashing becomes ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration simplicityVSAvoidbackwashing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The permeate collection function is extracted from the central axis location and relocated to multiple outer positions. This extraction eliminates the dead zone at the center where air pockets would otherwise be trapped, allowing air to be vented through the outer tubes during operation and making the backwashing process effective by preventing air entrapment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional filtration systems are used, then the initial setup is simple, but fouling layer buildup occurs and performance decreases over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfiltration performance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The outer permeate collecting tubes are positioned to create even pressure distribution from the start of filtration operation. This preliminary configuration prevents fouling layer buildup by maintaining uniform flux across the membrane surface, avoiding the localized high-flux conditions that occur with central tube systems and lead to premature fouling and performance degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the filtering effect by maintaining even flow and pressure across the membrane, increases the active area, reduces fouling risks, and improves backwashing efficiency, resulting in a more stable and effective filtration process.

Implementation Method 1

Common membranes for filtration are either flat shaped membranes or tubular membranes with one or more capillaries. Typically, such membranes are semi-permeable and mechanically separate permeate or filtrate and the retentate from raw water.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSemi-permeable membrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 2

the at least one permeate collecting tube is arranged in an outer part of the filtration element... ensuring even pressure distribution across the membrane during filtration and backwashing modes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven filtration: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

Membrane-based processes, such as microfiltration or ultrafiltration, remove turbidity caused by suspended solids and microorganisms such as pathogens like bacteria, germs and viruses from raw water.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP3107643B1Filtration element
Publication Date: 2020.05.06 DUPONT SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION INC
  • EP3107643B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3107643B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3107643B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a element (12) for filtering fluids comprising an element housing (14), wherein at least one membrane arrangement (22) and at least one permeate collecting tube (18, 19) are arranged within the element housing (14) and wherein the at least one permeate collecting tube (18, 19) is arranged in an outer part (44) of the filtration element (12). The invention further relates to a filtration module (10) and a filtration system (11) comprising such a filtration element (12) as well as uses of such a filtration element (12).