Fin Spacing Layout for Non-Merging Epitaxial Semiconductor Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor industry faces challenges in forming reliable semiconductor devices at increasingly smaller sizes due to the complexity and difficulty of fabrication processes as feature sizes decrease, leading to issues with fin structure patterning and epitaxial structure formation.

Innovation Solution

The process involves forming fin structures and epitaxial structures using double-patterning or multi-patterning techniques, with specific lateral distance control between fin structures to prevent merging, and subsequent epitaxial growth and doping to enhance device performance and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If feature sizes continue to decrease to increase functional density, then production efficiency and cost are improved, but fabrication process complexity and difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is divided into multiple discrete stages including forming first and second trenches at different depths, selective epitaxial growth in specific regions, and staged doping processes. This segmentation allows complex device formation to be broken down into manageable steps that can be controlled independently, resolving the contradiction between high functional density and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary actions by pre-forming trench isolation structures, creating depth-selective masks, and preparing epitaxial regions before final device assembly. These preliminary steps establish a controlled framework that enables subsequent processing to proceed with greater precision and less complexity, allowing smaller feature sizes to be achieved without proportionally increasing overall process difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If feature sizes decrease to increase functional density, then more devices fit per chip area, but manufacturing precision and reliability become more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional densityVSAvoiddevice dimension control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating region-specific structures with different properties: trench isolation regions with specific depths, epitaxial regions with controlled doping, and depth-selective mask regions. Each local area is optimized with precise dimensional control tailored to its specific function, enabling high functional density while maintaining manufacturing precision through localized process control rather than uniform processing across the entire chip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical lithographic patterning with chemistry-based epitaxial growth processes. The epitaxial growth naturally conforms to the underlying trench structures and mask patterns, providing self-aligned dimensional control that is more precise than purely mechanical methods. This substitution enables better control over device dimensions at smaller scales by utilizing chemical self-organization rather than mechanical patterning limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Length of moving object

If advanced patterning techniques are used to form smaller features, then device scaling is achieved, but process complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidfabrication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar patterning to three-dimensional depth-selective structuring. By forming trenches at different depths and performing selective epitaxial growth in vertical dimensions, the patent achieves advanced feature definition without requiring increasingly complex lateral patterning steps. This dimensional transition allows smaller effective feature sizes to be achieved through vertical control rather than purely lateral scaling, simplifying the manufacturing process compared to continued planar scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the formation of semiconductor devices with improved performance and reliability by preventing epitaxial structure merging and maintaining desired cell heights, thus enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of semiconductor device fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

forming a first p-type epitaxial structure over the first fin structure and forming a second p-type epitaxial structure over the second fin structure. The method also includes forming a first n-type epitaxial structure over the third fin structure and forming a second n-type epitaxial structure over the fourth fin structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxial growth: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS20230369131A1Structure and formation method of semiconductor device with epitaxial structures
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20230369131A1 patent drawing
  • US20230369131A1 patent drawing
  • US20230369131A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device structure and a formation method are provided. The method includes forming a first fin structure, a second fin structure, a third fin structure, and a fourth fin structure over a substrate. The second fin structure is between the first fin structure and the third fin structure, and the third fin structure is between the second fin structure and the fourth fin structure. A first lateral distance between the first and the second fin structures is greater than a second lateral distance between the third and the fourth fin structures. The method also includes forming a first p-type epitaxial structure over the first fin structure and forming a second p-type epitaxial structure over the second fin structure. The method further includes forming a first n-type epitaxial structure over the third fin structure and forming a second n-type epitaxial structure over the fourth fin structure.