Heat Dissipation Fin Stacker Layout for Stable Downward Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The stacker apparatus in manufacturing apparatus for heat dissipation fins becomes unstable due to increased weight as the number of stacked fins rises, requiring thicker stacker pins for stability but resulting in low rigidity and instability during operation.

Innovation Solution

The manufacturing apparatus is configured to allow the stacker apparatus to operate only in a downward motion when stacking and collecting heat dissipation fins, eliminating the need for upward movement and enabling the use of thicker stacker pins for stability, with a drop guide mechanism guiding the fins for precise placement and minimizing component operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the stacker apparatus is raised from below the holder apparatus to stack heat dissipation fins, then the fins can be collected and stacked, but the operation becomes unstable when the number of stacked fins increases and weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking capabilityVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stacker apparatus is inverted so that the stacker pins extend upward from the stacker base instead of downward. This allows the stacker to receive fins from above and stack them by lowering the stacker assembly, rather than raising it from below. The inversion changes the direction of operation to avoid the instability caused by lifting heavy stacked fins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The stacker pins are designed to extend beyond the stacker base by a specific length (5-15mm) to provide sufficient support for the stacked fins. This excessive extension ensures that the pins can firmly hold the fins during stacking and handling operations, preventing instability even when the stack becomes heavy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If thicker stacker pins are used to improve stability, then the rigidity increases, but the device complexity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacker stabilityVSAvoidstacker structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stacker is divided into separate functional components: a stacker base for support, a stacker assembly containing the pins and receiving portions, and a moving mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, with the pins providing stability through their dimensions and arrangement rather than requiring an overly complex overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stacker pins are designed with specific dimensional parameters (diameter of 2-10mm and extension length of 5-15mm) to achieve the required stability and rigidity. By optimizing these parameters, the pins provide sufficient structural integrity without requiring excessive thickness that would increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the stacker apparatus performs both upward and downward movements, then it can load and unload fins, but energy consumption increases and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and unloading capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stacker operates by moving downward to load fins and downward to unload fins, eliminating the need for upward movement. The inverted configuration allows gravity to assist the loading process, and the stacker is lowered to deposit fins at the destination. This unidirectional downward operation reduces energy consumption compared to traditional up-and-down movement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The stacker utilizes gravity to assist in the stacking process. By inverting the stacker and allowing fins to be deposited from above, gravity naturally guides the fins onto the pins during the lowering operation, reducing the energy required for the moving mechanism compared to actively lifting fins against gravity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240226990A9Manufacturing apparatus for heat dissipation fins
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 HIDAKA SEIKI KK
  • US20240226990A9 patent drawing
  • US20240226990A9 patent drawing
  • US20240226990A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing apparatus for heat dissipation fins can stably operate a stacker apparatus when stacking and collecting heat dissipation fins. Drop guide blades are provided above a holding apparatus for the heat dissipation fins disposed downstream of a cutoff apparatus that cuts a heat dissipation fin molding formed by a press apparatus into heat dissipation fins. When a stacker apparatus receives a heat dissipation fin from the holding apparatus, the drop guide blades approach the stacker apparatus and the heat dissipation fin is stacked and collected in the stacker apparatus by dropping to the stacker apparatus while being guided by the drop guide blades. After collecting the heat dissipation fins, only lowering operations of the stacker apparatus are performed.