Fin Trim Isolation in 10 nm IC Fabrication for Precise Fin Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scaling of features in integrated circuits to the 10 nanometer node and beyond is hindered by variability in conventional fabrication processes, limiting the ability to further miniaturize and optimize device performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of pitch quartering and fin trim isolation techniques, combined with advanced doping methods and trench isolation structures, to enhance transistor density and maintain desirable fin stress for improved carrier mobility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional fabrication processes are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to variability at 10 nanometer node and smaller

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature size precisionVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pitch quartering which divides the patterning process into multiple stages, creating mandrels and spacers in sequential steps to achieve finer feature sizes. This segmentation enables precise control of fin dimensions and spacing that cannot be achieved with conventional single-step lithography at 10 nanometer node and below

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements fin trim isolation that creates different fin depths and isolation characteristics in different regions of the substrate. By selectively removing portions of fins and applying localized isolation structures, the process achieves variable fin properties across the wafer to optimize device performance while maintaining manufacturing control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If feature size is reduced to increase device density, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to process variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidfeature size control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms isolation structures before final fin patterning and trimming operations. By pre-establishing the isolation framework, subsequent fin formation and trimming processes can proceed with better control over final fin dimensions and positions, reducing variability even as feature sizes shrink to increase device density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The self-aligned spacer formation process uses the mandrels themselves to define the position of spacers, eliminating the need for separate alignment steps. This self-service mechanism inherently maintains precision as features are reduced in size, since each feature's position is determined by its neighbor rather than by global alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If pitch quartering and fin trim isolation techniques are implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin isolation controlVSAvoidfabrication process steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pitch quartering process nests multiple patterning cycles within each other, where spacers are formed around mandrels, then mandrels are removed and new spacers are formed around the first spacers. This nested structure of process steps systematically builds complexity while maintaining precision through repeated application of the same fundamental formation/removal cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar patterning to three-dimensional fin structures with varying depths. By adding the vertical dimension through selective fin removal and differential isolation, the process achieves precise fin control that cannot be obtained through planar techniques alone, justifying the increased process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If advanced doping methods and trench isolation structures are used, then transistor performance is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor performanceVSAvoidfabrication simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different doping concentrations and isolation structures to different regions of the substrate based on device requirements. By locally optimizing fin properties, doping profiles, and isolation characteristics, the process achieves superior transistor performance across diverse device types while managing manufacturing complexity through regional specialization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12057492B2Gate cut and fin trim isolation for advanced integrated circuit structure fabrication
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 INTEL CORP
  • US12057492B2 patent drawing
  • US12057492B2 patent drawing
  • US12057492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the disclosure are in the field of advanced integrated circuit structure fabrication and, in particular, 10 nanometer node and smaller integrated circuit structure fabrication and the resulting structures. In an example, a method includes forming a plurality of fins and forming a plurality of gate structures over the plurality of fins. A dielectric material structure is formed between adjacent ones of the plurality of gate structures. A portion of a first of the plurality of gate structures is removed to expose a first portion of each of the plurality of fins, and a portion of a second of the plurality of gate structures is removed to expose a second portion of each of the plurality of fins. The exposed first portion of each of the plurality of fins is removed, but the exposed second portion of each of the plurality of fins is not removed.