Financial Conscientiousness Score via Visual Choice ML

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining creditworthiness are inefficient for individuals without access to traditional credit data, as they often rely on language-dependent psychological tests that can be manipulated and do not account for creditworthiness validation.

Innovation Solution

A processor-implemented method using a machine learning model trained on visual choices from a client device, which correlates trait scores derived from a hybrid psychological framework with credit history or loan repayment records to determine a financial conscientiousness score, incorporating numeracy questions and time constraints to prevent manipulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional credit scoring methods are used, then creditworthiness can be determined for individuals with credit history, but the method fails for individuals without access to traditional credit data (young people, rural residents)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to individuals without credit historyVSAvoidcreditworthiness assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces psychological traits as an intermediary measure to assess creditworthiness. Instead of directly using credit history (which is unavailable for many), the system uses psychological assessments to infer traits like conscientiousness, integrity, and emotional stability that correlate with credit behavior. This intermediary approach enables creditworthiness assessment for individuals without traditional credit data while maintaining reliability through validated psychological frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the assessment parameters from traditional financial metrics (credit history, income, employment) to psychological parameters (conscientiousness, integrity, emotional stability). By measuring different parameters that are more universally accessible and less susceptible to manipulation, the system can assess creditworthiness for a broader population including young people and rural residents who lack traditional credit records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If language-based psychological tests are used, then psychological traits can be assessed, but the tests can be manipulated by users and require translation to multiple languages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepsychological assessment accessibilityVSAvoidresponse authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces language-based mechanical response systems with visual choice-based assessment. Instead of requiring users to read and interpret text questions in their native language (which requires translation and allows for manipulation), the system presents visual scenarios and measures automatic emotional and cognitive responses. This substitution eliminates language barriers and reduces manipulation opportunities while maintaining assessment accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional psychological testing approach. Instead of presenting text questions and asking for verbal/written responses (which users can manipulate), the system presents visual stimuli and measures automatic physiological and behavioral responses. This inversion captures more authentic psychological traits by measuring what users cannot consciously control or fake.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If users are given sufficient time to evaluate psychological test questions, then they can provide thoughtful responses, but they can also manipulate their answers to obtain desired scores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse qualityVSAvoidscore authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses time constraints as a periodic action mechanism to prevent manipulation. By limiting the time users have to respond to visual scenarios, the system captures automatic, authentic psychological responses before users can engage in deliberate manipulation. The time-bound nature of the assessment ensures responses reflect genuine psychological traits rather than calculated answers designed to achieve desired scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11922493B2System and method for deriving financial conscientiousness score through visual choices using machine learning model
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 CONFIRMU PTE LTD
  • US11922493B2 patent drawing
  • US11922493B2 patent drawing
  • US11922493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of deriving a financial conscientiousness score from visual choices, using a machine learning model that is trained at a server is provided. The method includes (i) obtaining visual selection as an input from the user that is selected from one or more different visual choices that are displayed to the user, (ii) determining trait scores for a subset of traits based on the points that are attributed to the visual choices, (iii) training, a machine learning model by correlating the trait scores for the subset of traits with a previous credit history or a loan repayment record of the user to obtain a trained machine learning model, and (iv) determining, using the trained machine learning model, a financial conscientiousness score based on the trait scores for the subset of traits.