Automated Financial Form Completion via Visual Data Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Completing financial forms accurately and efficiently is challenging due to their complexity and the need to report multiple financial events, often requiring manual input of various financial values and data across multiple sections, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that generates panels for each financial event, captures and displays relevant financial values, and customizes the user experience by applying visual data items, allowing for automated population of financial forms using visual data sources and previously populated form data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual input methods are used to complete financial forms, then data accuracy can be maintained through user review, but time consumption and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform completion speedVSAvoidform structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The financial form is segmented into multiple panels, each corresponding to a specific financial event (e.g., employment income, investment income, deductions). This segmentation allows the system to process and display information in manageable units, reducing the perceived complexity while enabling automated population of each panel independently, thus improving productivity without overwhelming the user with the entire form at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that acts as a mediator between raw financial data sources and the final form presentation. This intermediary automatically extracts, validates, and populates form fields based on uploaded documents and data sources, reducing manual input requirements while maintaining data accuracy through automated verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If automated data population is implemented, then time consumption is reduced, but data accuracy and reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform completion timeVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where automated population results are validated against multiple data sources and cross-checked for consistency. The interface provides feedback to users about populated data, allowing them to review and correct entries, thus maintaining reliability while benefiting from automated speed. The system also provides feedback loops that learn from user corrections to improve future automated population accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and validating data before it is populated into the form. Data is extracted and verified against multiple sources in advance, and potential errors are detected and flagged before the user sees the form, ensuring higher data accuracy while maintaining automated efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive financial event coverage is provided, then form completeness is improved, but user interface complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial event coverageVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the comprehensive financial form into event-specific panels (employment, investments, real estate, deductions, etc.), the system maintains adaptability to cover all financial events while improving ease of operation. Users only need to interact with the panels relevant to their specific situation, rather than navigating a monolithic complex form, thus making the interface more manageable while preserving comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The user interface dynamically adapts based on user input and data availability. Panels are shown or hidden based on which financial events apply to the user, and the interface adjusts its complexity in real-time. This dynamic behavior allows the system to provide comprehensive financial event coverage when needed while maintaining simplicity for users with fewer financial events, thus improving ease of operation without sacrificing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8019664B1System and method for completing a form
Publication Date: 2011.09.13 INTUIT INC
  • US8019664B1 patent drawing
  • US8019664B1 patent drawing
  • US8019664B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for completing a financial form by a user, including: generating a plurality of panels associated with a plurality of financial events reported by the financial form; obtaining a visual data item associated with the user and a financial event of the plurality of financial events; applying the visual data item to a panel of the plurality of panels, where the panel is associated with the financial event; capturing a financial value associated with the financial event using the panel; populating at least a portion of the financial form based on the financial value; extracting a key from a previously populated financial form associated with the user; and searching a visual data source based on the key, where the visual data item is located in the visual data source.