Enterprise Financial Modeling With Dynamic Compute Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems are unable to efficiently model the effect of investments on the financial status of organizations due to variability in operations and financial goals, leading to inefficiencies in simulating potential outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A simulation system utilizing simulation compute devices with diverse compute resources, an orchestrator device for task assignment, and a model library server to dynamically allocate resources based on demand and suitability, simulating investment effects on financial health using rules-based and machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems are used to model investment effects, then the system structure is simple, but the ability to efficiently model variability in operations and financial goals is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to model variability in operations and financial goalsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: simulation compute devices for executing models, an orchestrator device for task management, and a model library server for storing models. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to handle complex financial modeling scenarios with varying organizational goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation compute devices are designed to execute multiple types of financial models (rules-based and machine learning) for different organizational types and financial goals. The system can adapt to model different scenarios including cash flow funding, asset-to-liability ratios, and other financial objectives through a universal platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If more compute resources are allocated to simulate investment outcomes, then the simulation accuracy and speed improve, but the resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation speed and accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically allocates compute resources based on the complexity of the simulation and the number of scenarios to be modeled. The orchestrator device assigns tasks to available compute devices, adjusting resource allocation in real-time to match computational demands while optimizing energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple simulation compute devices to create parallel copies of the same simulation process, each handling different scenarios or time periods simultaneously. This parallel processing approach maintains high simulation accuracy and speed while distributing the computational load across multiple devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system models multiple organizations with different financial goals simultaneously, then the comprehensiveness of analysis improves, but the system complexity and resource management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive analysis capabilityVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis work by organizing simulations according to organizational types and financial goals. The model library server stores models categorized by organization type, and the orchestrator device assigns specific organizational simulations to appropriate compute devices, managing complexity through structured organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system handles different organizational goals by changing simulation parameters and model selections rather than creating entirely separate systems. The same computational infrastructure supports diverse financial modeling scenarios by adjusting input parameters, model algorithms, and evaluation metrics according to the specific organizational objectives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260038048A1Technologies for Enterprise Financial Modeling
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US20260038048A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038048A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038048A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies for enterprise financial modeling include a system with circuitry configured obtain parameter data indicative of a financial status of an organization. The circuitry may be further configured to select, as a function of the parameter data and from a set of models for tracking key financial metrics of different types of organizations, a model. Additionally, the circuitry may be configured to simulate, using the selected model and by dynamically allocating compute resources across multiple compute devices as a function of a simulation compute load, an effect of a predicted performance of a set of investments on the financial status of the organization. Other embodiments are also described and claimed.