Financial Product Control Parameter Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment processing systems, particularly those based on legacy infrastructure, struggle to keep pace with technological advancements and customer demands due to their rigidity and high maintenance costs, limiting the ability of financial institutions to offer sophisticated payment processing approaches.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for modifying and adding control parameters to financial products and accounts, allowing for secure and flexible payment transactions through the generation of 'child products' linked to core accounts, which can be managed and modified via various channels such as the internet, SMS, email, or telephone, and include additional security screenings to prevent malicious use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If legacy payment processing systems are used, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to new payment technologies and customer demands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to payment technology advancementsVSAvoidlegacy system rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments payment processing into two independent layers: a stable legacy core system and a flexible control parameter layer. Control parameters are separated from the legacy system logic, allowing them to be modified independently without changing the underlying legacy infrastructure. This enables adaptability to new payment technologies while maintaining legacy system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Control parameters act as an intermediary layer between the legacy payment processing system and new payment requirements. This intermediary layer allows the system to accommodate sophisticated payment processing approaches and new technologies without directly modifying the rigid legacy infrastructure, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and system rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If control parameters are added to financial products, then security is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidparameter management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter changes to enhance security by introducing control parameters that define use restrictions for financial products. These parameters (such as spending limits, geographic restrictions, time-based controls) are applied to existing financial products without fundamentally changing the product structure or requiring complex system redesign, thus improving security with minimal complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If security screening is performed on product recipients, then reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention capabilityVSAvoidproduct generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Security screening is performed as a preliminary action during product generation, before the financial product is fully created and activated. By conducting security checks upfront on prospective product recipients, the system prevents fraudulent product creation while allowing legitimate product generation to proceed efficiently. This preliminary security measure avoids delays during actual transaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10592902B2Systems and methods for enhanced transaction processing
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 VERIENT
  • US10592902B2 patent drawing
  • US10592902B2 patent drawing
  • US10592902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for modifying control parameters associated with a financial product that is linked to an account. The method includes receiving updated control parameters for the financial product, where the account provides financial backing for the financial product, and the updated control parameters define updated use restrictions for the financial product; and modifying the control parameters associated with the financial product to reflect the updated control parameters, where the financial product is configured to be used for one or more payment transactions in accordance with the updated use restrictions.