Financial Transaction Reconciliation Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reconciliation processes for financial transactions across business units are error-prone and inefficient due to manual intervention, limited flexibility in data format management, and inadequate auto-match logic creation, leading to increased unmatched transactions and compliance challenges with industry standards like Sarbanes-Oxley.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automating financial transaction reconciliation that captures and transforms data from various formats, performs auto-matching using customizable logic, and generates reports, while providing user privileges and audit trails to ensure a controlled and standardized process, enabling efficient management of multiple data formats and activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual reconciliation processes are used, then flexibility in handling different data formats is maintained, but error rate increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvereconciliation accuracyVSAvoidreconciliation efficiency

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service reconciliation by capturing transaction data from multiple sources, transforming it into standardized formats, and automatically matching transactions without requiring manual intervention for routine operations, thereby improving both accuracy and efficiency

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms transaction data from various formats into a standardized format by changing data parameters and structures, enabling automated processing while maintaining the ability to handle diverse input formats, thus resolving the contradiction between automation and flexibility

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated reconciliation tools are used, then productivity increases, but flexibility in data format management and auto-match logic creation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvereconciliation efficiencyVSAvoiddata format flexibility

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides universal reconciliation capabilities that can handle multiple data formats and transaction types through a single automated platform, allowing organizations to maintain flexibility in managing diverse data sources while benefiting from automation-driven productivity improvements

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic configuration of auto-match logics and data transformation rules, enabling the automated reconciliation process to adapt to different data formats and business requirements without sacrificing automation efficiency or flexibility

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual data transformation is performed, then adaptability to different data formats is maintained, but loss of time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedata format management flexibilityVSAvoidreconciliation time

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated transformation of transaction data into standardized formats before reconciliation, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual data transformation while maintaining adaptability to handle various input formats through pre-configured transformation rules

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If existing reconciliation tools are used, then some automation is achieved, but control and standardization of the reconciliation process is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprocess control

Core Design Contradiction:

Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates comprehensive audit trails and validation mechanisms that provide feedback on the reconciliation process, ensuring standardized and controlled automated operations while maintaining transparency and compliance with industry standards such as Sarbanes-Oxley

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8694393B2System and method for reconciling one or more financial transactions

Publication Date: 2014.04.08 LIBERTY PEAK VENTURES LLC

AI summary

A system, method and computer program product for reconciling one or more financial transactions of one or more business units. The method includes capturing transaction data from the financial transactions using a first set of data logics. The capturing further includes extracting the transaction data from the financial transactions using import templates and transforming the extracted transaction data to a predefined format, using a first set of validations. The captured transaction data is then auto-matched with master data as reference, using one or more auto-match logics and a second set of validations. One or more reports are then generated on the auto-matched transaction data. The method further includes providing user privileges for controlling the capturing, the auto-matching, and the generation of the one or more reports according to a first predefined criterion.