Digital Financial Risk Scoring With Real-Time Data Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing financial risk assessment systems for tenancy and mortgage qualifications rely on outdated, inefficient, and insecure methods involving manual data entry and single-point-in-time checks, leading to inaccuracies, computational inefficiencies, and susceptibility to fraud.

Innovation Solution

A system that continuously extracts and categorizes financial data from external sources via secure APIs, applies predictive algorithms to generate qualifier scores, and dynamically adjusts weights based on real-time data, ensuring accurate and secure risk assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual data entry and single-point-in-time checks are used, then the system is simpler to implement, but the accuracy and reliability of risk assessment deteriorates due to outdated data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk assessmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and storing financial data from multiple sources before the actual risk assessment is needed. This pre-positioning of data ensures that when assessment is required, current and accurate information is immediately available, eliminating the need for manual data entry at the time of assessment while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of financial data from multiple external sources (banks, credit bureaus, employers) and stores them in a standardized format. These digital copies replace physical documentation and manual data entry, enabling automated processing and verification while maintaining data accuracy through systematic collection and validation protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If extensive manual intervention and physical documentation are required, then data verification can be performed, but computational efficiency and processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata verification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical manual verification processes with automated electronic data validation. Algorithms automatically cross-reference financial data from multiple sources, verify consistency, and detect anomalies without human intervention. This substitution maintains verification reliability through systematic checking while dramatically increasing processing speed by eliminating manual handling of physical documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where data from multiple sources is constantly cross-verified against each other. Discrepancies trigger automatic re-verification processes, and the system learns from verification outcomes to improve future assessments. This feedback mechanism ensures high reliability while maintaining efficiency through automated iterative validation rather than repeated manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If physical documentation and forms are used for data collection, then data can be collected comprehensively, but the system becomes vulnerable to fraud and data manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of data collectionVSAvoidsusceptibility to fraud
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical documentation with digital copies obtained directly from source systems through automated interfaces. Data is extracted in standardized electronic formats from banks, credit bureaus, and employers, eliminating the need for physical forms that can be forged. This digital copying process maintains complete data collection while preventing fraud through direct electronic retrieval and cryptographic verification of data authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces secure electronic intermediaries (APIs, encrypted communication channels, authenticated data exchange protocols) between data sources and the assessment system. These intermediaries verify the authenticity of transmitted data through digital signatures and encryption, ensuring that information is complete while protecting against manipulation. The intermediary layer validates data integrity without requiring physical document handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If continuous data extraction from multiple external systems is implemented, then real-time accuracy is improved, but computational load and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time data accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the specific data elements needed for risk assessment from external systems, rather than continuously processing all available data. Predefined data extraction rules identify and retrieve only relevant financial information (income, assets, liabilities, credit history) from multiple sources. This selective extraction maintains real-time accuracy for assessment-critical data while significantly reducing computational load by ignoring unnecessary information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments data collection and processing into distinct modular components, each handling specific data types from specific sources. Data extraction, validation, storage, and analysis are separated into independent modules that can operate efficiently in parallel. This segmentation allows the system to maintain real-time accuracy for each data category while optimizing resource usage by processing only what is necessary in each module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260010948A1Systems and methods for financial risk assessment and digital security enhancement
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 CLOSERLY INC
  • US20260010948A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010948A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are methods, systems, and devices for financial risk assessment and digital security enhancement. This includes receiving, at the host processor via the computing network, a plurality of input signals from a plurality of primary systems, the input signals corresponding to a client identifier to generate a corresponding first record; analyzing the corresponding first record, to extract a corresponding second record by implementing a plurality of predefined tags and generating a categorized record; receiving physical asset signals, associated to the client identifier, from an external asset system; generating a qualifier score based on a predictive algorithm applied to the categorized record and the physical asset signals, the predictive algorithm assigning weights to the plurality of data categories in the categorized record; and determining whether the qualifier score meets a one or more threshold range.