Financing Program Optimization Platform Using Simulated Loan Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current credit assessment systems in the financial industry often fail to accurately evaluate merchants' options for offering financing programs, leading to suboptimal business performance and customer satisfaction, as they primarily focus on customer creditworthiness without considering merchant-specific tools and options.

Innovation Solution

A financing program optimization platform that uses historical loan data, machine learning models, and simulation techniques to determine a set of optimized financing programs by calculating selection probability scores, cash flow ratings, and valuation scores based on various loan parameters, such as term length, interest rates, and merchant discount rates, to maximize appeal to customers while minimizing risk for the underwriter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional credit assessment systems focus only on customer creditworthiness, then customer loan approval can be processed, but merchant-specific financing program optimization is ignored leading to suboptimal business performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebusiness performanceVSAvoidmerchant-specific tools and options
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the credit assessment process into two distinct evaluation streams: customer creditworthiness assessment and merchant financing program optimization. By separating these functions, the system can independently optimize each aspect - evaluating customer risk while simultaneously determining the most suitable financing program parameters (term length, interest rates, discount rates) for each merchant, thereby improving overall business performance without compromising either function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts financing program parameters based on real-time analysis of historical loan data, merchant performance metrics, and risk assessments. Rather than using static credit assessment criteria, the system continuously optimizes term length, interest rates, and merchant discount rates to adapt to changing business conditions, customer preferences, and risk profiles, enabling merchants to offer optimized financing programs that maximize business performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If financing programs are optimized to maximize customer appeal, then customer satisfaction and volume increase, but risk for the underwriter may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer appealVSAvoidunderwriter risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes financing program parameters (term length, interest rates, merchant discount rates) by analyzing the relationship between customer appeal and underwriter risk. It identifies the optimal parameter combinations that maximize customer acceptance while maintaining acceptable risk levels through data-driven adjustments to each parameter, creating a balanced financing program that satisfies both customer preferences and risk management requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor loan performance, customer selection patterns, and risk outcomes. By analyzing historical data on which financing programs were selected by customers and their subsequent performance, the system refines its optimization algorithms to better balance customer appeal with risk management, adjusting program parameters based on actual outcomes rather than theoretical models alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple financing program options are offered to merchants, then customer selection and satisfaction improve, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancing program optionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the optimization platform automatically generates, evaluates, and recommends financing program options without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously analyzes historical data, simulates various program scenarios, and produces optimized recommendations, reducing the operational complexity burden despite offering multiple financing options to merchants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240104645A1System, method and apparatus for optimization of financing programs
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 AFFIRM INC
  • US20240104645A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104645A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104645A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying a set of optimized financing programs to provide to a merchant may include receiving historical loan application data defining historical parameters associated with corresponding historical loan applications, replacing at least a portion of the historical parameters of the historical loan application data with new parameters associated with different loan terms to define a simulated loan data set defining simulated financing programs, determining a selection probability score for each of the simulated financing programs, the selection probability score indicating a likelihood of customer selection of each respective one of the simulated financing programs, determining a cash flow rating for each of the simulated financing programs, the cash flow rating estimating cash flow over time for the each respective one of the simulated financing programs, determining a valuation score based on the selection probability score and the cash flow rating of the each respective one of the simulated financing programs, and determining the set of optimized financing programs based on the valuation score of the each respective one of the simulated financing programs.