Fine Blanking Press Control Using Sensor Feedback and Auto Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The setup of fine blanking systems is complex and time-consuming due to the need for manual adjustments of numerous components, which change over time due to wear or age, requiring frequent recalibration and differing performance behaviors even among identical components from the same suppliers.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing sensors to collect parameter data from components, determining and applying adjustments to control parameters automatically, creating a 'fingerprint' for each component and system to optimize production parameters, allowing for real-time adjustments and predictive maintenance to compensate for changes and ensure optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are performed to optimize production parameters, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction parameters optimizationVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts its own parameters by collecting sensor data, analyzing performance, and modifying control parameters without external intervention. The fine blanking system performs self-optimization through automated feedback loops, eliminating the need for manual setup and adjustment operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor networks continuously monitor system parameters and feed this data back to the control system. The control system analyzes this feedback and automatically adjusts control parameters to optimize production, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are performed to optimize production parameters, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction parameters optimizationVSAvoidsystem setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously manages its own optimization process through integrated sensor networks and automated control algorithms. The complexity of parameter optimization is handled internally by the system's self-service mechanisms rather than requiring complex external manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical adjustment operations are replaced by automated electronic control systems. Sensors, actuators, and control algorithms substitute for manual intervention, transforming a mechanically complex manual process into an automated electronic control system that reduces operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If components are monitored and adjusted over time, then reliability is improved, but loss of time for adjustments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance consistencyVSAvoidrecalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor networks and automated control systems operate continuously without interruption to monitor and adjust component parameters. The system maintains continuous optimization of component performance throughout operation, eliminating periodic downtime for recalibration while ensuring consistent reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors its own component health and performs self-adjustment in real-time without requiring external intervention or shutdown. This continuous self-service operation maintains component reliability while eliminating time loss associated with manual recalibration cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If automated sensor-based adjustments are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor networks and control systems serve multiple functions simultaneously: monitoring, data collection, analysis, and automated adjustment. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a unified platform, improving productivity while managing overall system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple previously separate functions (sensing, control, optimization) are merged into an integrated automated system. The combination of sensor networks with control algorithms and actuation systems creates a unified automated optimization platform that improves productivity without proportionally increasing complexity through integration synergies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method simplifies the setup and operation of fine blanking systems by enabling automatic adjustments, reducing manual effort, predicting potential failures, and maintaining optimal production parameters, thus enhancing efficiency and reducing downtime.

Implementation Method 1

sensors arranged to collect parameter data from the at least one first press unit and/or the at least one second press unit and/or from other components of the fine blanking system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Implementation Method 2

The press ram exerting the main blanking force can for example be driven by a hydraulic cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

accumulators, such as gas cylinders filled with for example nitrogen, are provided, wherein an actuation of the hydraulic cylinder of the cushion during the driving movement of the press ram compresses the gas in the accumulator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3725502B1Method for operating a fine blanking system
Publication Date: 2023.03.01 LAPMASTER WOLTERS GMBH
  • EP3725502B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3725502B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention pertains to a method for operating a fine blanking system comprising at least one fine blanking press (100, 102) comprising at least one first press unit and at least one second press unit, further comprising at least one first press drive (13) for driving the at least one first press unit in a first driving movement against the at least one second press unit during a fine blanking process step, further comprising sensors (36) arranged to collect parameter data from the at least one first press unit and/or the at least one second press unit and/or from other components of the fine blanking system, the method comprising the steps of: • collecting parameter data with the sensors (36) from the at least one first press unit and/or the at least one second press unit and/or from other components of the fine blanking system during a first fine blanking process step, • determining adjustments for control parameters of the at least one first press unit and/or the at least one second press unit and/or of other components of the fine blanking system based on the collected parameter data, and • applying the adjustments to the control parameters of the at least one first press unit and/or the at least one second press unit and/or of other components of the fine blanking system in a second fine blanking process step subsequent to the first fine blanking process step.