Fine Blanking Press Control Using Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The setup of fine blanking systems is complex and time-consuming due to the need for manual adjustments of numerous components, which change over time due to wear or age, requiring frequent recalibration to achieve optimal production parameters.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing sensors to collect parameter data from components of the fine blanking system, determining and applying adjustments to control parameters based on this data to simplify and automate the setup process, allowing for real-time adjustments and predictive maintenance to maintain optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are performed to set up optimum production parameters, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but setup time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimum production parametersVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and applies adjustments to control parameters based on sensor data collected during fine blanking process steps, enabling the system to self-optimize without manual intervention. The control unit autonomously analyzes component behavior changes and recalibrates parameters, making the system self-servicing regarding parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors collect parameter data from press units and other components during fine blanking process steps, providing feedback to the control unit. This feedback loop enables continuous monitoring and automatic adjustment of control parameters based on actual component performance and behavior changes over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual adjustments are performed frequently to account for component wear and age, then reliability is maintained, but loss of time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance consistencyVSAvoidrecalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor network continuously monitors parameter data from components, providing real-time feedback on component behavior changes due to wear or age. The control unit processes this feedback and automatically determines adjustments to maintain optimal performance, eliminating the need for frequent manual recalibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical adjustment process is replaced with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors and a control unit to determine and apply parameter adjustments automatically, substituting human operation with an automated control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If numerous components are adjusted manually to achieve optimal interaction, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent interaction optimizationVSAvoidsetup simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and applies adjustments to control parameters of multiple components based on sensor data, eliminating the need for manual adjustment of numerous components. The control unit autonomously optimizes component interactions by analyzing collected parameter data and applying appropriate adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it collects parameter data from sensors, analyzes component behavior, determines appropriate adjustments, and applies them to various control parameters across different components, consolidating multiple adjustment tasks into a single multi-functional control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11331711B2Method for operating a fine blanking system
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 LAPMASTER WOLTERS GMBH
  • US11331711B2 patent drawing
  • US11331711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a fine blanking system comprises at least one fine blanking press having a first press unit, a second press unit, and one or more sensors. The method comprises obtaining parameter data from the one or more sensors for at least one of the first press unit, the second press unit, and another component of the fine blanking system during a first fine blanking process step. Adjustments are determined for control parameters of at least one of the first press unit, the second press unit, and the other component based on the parameter data. The adjustments are applied to the control parameters in a second fine blanking process step subsequent to the first fine blanking process step.