FinFET Epitaxy Doping for Carrier Mobility and Contact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor industry faces challenges in achieving higher device density, performance, and lower costs, particularly in the fabrication and design of FinFET devices, where current methods struggle to optimize current flow and reduce short-channel effects effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming semiconductor fins on a substrate using photolithography and etching techniques, followed by the formation of gate structures and epitaxy features, and employing plasma doping and annealing processes to create doped source/drain portions that enhance carrier mobility and reduce contact resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional fabrication methods are used for FinFET devices, then manufacturing process simplicity is maintained, but device density and performance optimization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is divided into multiple patterning steps (first and second photolithography processes, first and second etching processes) to create complex fin structures with different orientations and configurations, enabling higher device density while managing process complexity through systematic breakdown of the fabrication sequence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from planar transistor structures to three-dimensional FinFET structures with vertical fins extending from the substrate, utilizing the vertical dimension to increase effective channel area and device density without proportionally increasing the footprint area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If standard doping methods are used, then process simplicity is maintained, but carrier mobility and contact resistance optimization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier mobilityVSAvoiddoping process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Dopant layers are deposited and patterned in advance before the final annealing step, with specific dopant regions formed in source/drain areas and channel regions at different stages of the fabrication process, allowing optimized doping profiles to be achieved before device operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple annealing processes at different temperatures and durations to control dopant diffusion and activation, changing thermal parameters to optimize carrier mobility and reduce contact resistance in different device regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If uniform doping is applied throughout the fin structure, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but short-channel effects are not effectively reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort-channel effect controlVSAvoiddoping uniformity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different dopant concentrations and types are applied to different regions of the fin structure, with heavily doped source/drain regions, lightly doped channel regions, and selectively doped areas to create optimal electrical characteristics for each functional zone while mitigating short-channel effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dopants in excess in certain regions (such as source/drain extensions) and uses selective removal or activation steps to achieve the desired non-uniform doping profile, allowing enhanced doping in critical areas while maintaining control over overall device characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves carrier mobility and device performance by straining the channel portion of the semiconductor fins, reducing contact resistance, and allowing for higher impurity concentrations, thereby enhancing the overall performance and efficiency of FinFET devices.

Implementation Method 1

plasma doping and annealing processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

plasma doping process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Implementation Method 3

diffusing a dopant from the dopant source layer into the epitaxy feature through the capped top surface and the sidewall of the epitaxy feature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 4

forming semiconductor fins on a substrate using photolithography and etching techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotolithography: Photography

Data Source

PatentUS10879354B2Semiconductor device and forming method thereof
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10879354B2 patent drawing
  • US10879354B2 patent drawing
  • US10879354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a semiconductor substrate, a dielectric feature and an epitaxy feature. The epitaxy feature is on the semiconductor substrate. The epitaxy feature has a top central portion and a corner portion. The dielectric feature is closer to the corner portion than the top central portion, and the corner portion has an impurity concentration higher than that of the top central portion.