FinFET Epitaxy Source/Drain Formation via Selective Growth Cycles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scaling down of Integrated Circuit (IC) technology has increased complexity in processing and manufacturing, particularly in the formation of Fin Field-Effect Transistors (FinFETs), where existing methods struggle to effectively form epitaxy source/drain regions with precise control and high efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming semiconductor fins, patterning hard masks, performing anisotropic and isotropic etches to create trenches, forming isolation regions, depositing and etching back epitaxy materials to form source/drain regions, and using multiple deposition-etch-back cycles to achieve precise control and high impurity concentrations in epitaxy regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing methods are used to form epitaxy source/drain regions in FinFETs, then the basic structure can be formed, but precise control and high efficiency are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precision of epitaxy source/drain regionsVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the epitaxy source/drain region formation into multiple discrete steps: forming seed regions, selective epitaxial growth, etching back, and repeated cycles. This segmentation allows precise control over each stage while maintaining overall manufacturing efficiency through systematic process organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by forming seed regions and isolation structures before the main epitaxial growth. These preparatory steps establish controlled nucleation sites and prevent unwanted bridging, enabling subsequent precise epitaxy formation without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If scaling down is performed to increase functional density, then production efficiency increases and costs decrease, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs universal process steps that can be applied across different FinFET generations and scaling nodes. The repeated cycles of epitaxial growth, etching, and deposition serve multiple functions: controlling dimensions, forming doping regions, creating stress patterns, and preventing bridging, thereby managing complexity through standardized multi-functional operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested process cycles where each cycle contains embedded steps (deposition, etching, annealing) that are repeated and nested within the overall FinFET fabrication sequence. This nesting allows systematic scaling while maintaining process control through hierarchical process organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple deposition-etch-back cycles are performed to achieve precise control, then manufacturing precision improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of epitaxy source/drain regionsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity by performing repeated epitaxial growth and etching cycles without breaking the process flow. Each cycle builds upon the previous one, continuously refining the source/drain region geometry and composition. This continuous action achieves high precision while minimizing idle time between critical process steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic repetition of deposition-etch-back cycles with controlled parameters. Each periodic cycle contributes incrementally to the final precision, allowing systematic achievement of dimensional control and compositional gradients while managing total processing time through optimized cycle duration and number of repetitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of FinFETs with improved performance by confining epitaxy growth, achieving flatter top surfaces, and reducing the likelihood of bridging between FinFETs, thereby enhancing the functional density and efficiency of ICs.

Implementation Method 1

performing an epitaxy to regrow source/drain regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS10777664B2Epitaxy source/drain regions of FinFETs and method forming same
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10777664B2 patent drawing
  • US10777664B2 patent drawing
  • US10777664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes forming isolation regions extending into a semiconductor substrate, and recessing the isolation regions, so that portions of semiconductor strips between the isolation regions protrude higher than the isolation regions to form semiconductor fins. The method further includes recessing the semiconductor fins to form recesses, epitaxially growing a first semiconductor material from the recesses, etching the first semiconductor material, and epitaxially growing a second semiconductor material from the first semiconductor material that has been etched back.