FinFET Heterojunction Gate Control and Leakage Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

FinFET transistors with different crystalline materials in the fin and fin support face challenges with reduced gate control voltage, leading to leakage and decreased current due to limited electric field penetration, which is exacerbated by mechanical instability and line edge roughness in narrow fins.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a heterojunction between crystalline semiconductor materials in the fin and fin support, with a gate dielectric that fits both surfaces, and the use of shallow trench isolation oxide to electrically isolate the fin support, enhancing gate control and current density by confining electrons and holes without a dielectric between the fin and support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a narrow fin is used to improve gate control, then gate control voltage is improved, but mechanical instability and line edge roughness increase causing yield loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate control voltageVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a heterojunction structure where the fin is made of a first crystalline semiconductor material (e.g., SiGe) and the fin support is made of a second crystalline semiconductor material (e.g., Si). This composite material approach allows the fin to be narrower for better gate control while the fin support provides mechanical stability, resolving the contradiction between improved gate control and mechanical stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If different crystalline materials are used in fin and fin support to improve gate control, then gate control voltage is improved, but lattice constant and bandgap compatibility issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate control voltageVSAvoidlattice constant compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully selects crystalline semiconductor materials with specific lattice constants and bandgaps that are compatible with each other. The first crystalline semiconductor material in the fin and the second crystalline semiconductor material in the fin support are chosen to have matching lattice constants to minimize dislocation, while maintaining different bandgaps to achieve the desired heterojunction effects for improved gate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the gate electric field is extended deeper into the fin to improve current control, then on-state current is improved, but leakage through the middle of the fin increases in off-state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-state currentVSAvoidleakage current
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a heterojunction where the band structure varies locally within the fin. The first crystalline semiconductor material in the fin channel and the second crystalline semiconductor material in the fin support create different bandgaps, which locally modify the electric field distribution. This allows deeper penetration of the gate electric field to improve on-state current while the heterojunction structure prevents excessive leakage in off-state by creating potential barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves gate control voltage and current density in FinFET transistors, particularly at the heterojunction, reducing leakage and increasing on-state current, while maintaining mechanical stability and yield.

Implementation Method 1

The first crystalline semiconductor material of the first fin and the second crystalline semiconductor material of the first fin support form a first heterojunction in between

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeterojunction:

Implementation Method 2

the electric field generated by the gate control voltage can be limited in depth and may not extend sufficiently into the cross-sectional middle of the fin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 3

the use of shallow trench isolation oxide to electrically isolate the fin support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Isolation:

Data Source

PatentUS10756212B2FinFET with heterojunction and improved channel control
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US10756212B2 patent drawing
  • US10756212B2 patent drawing
  • US10756212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Roughly described, a computer program product describes a transistor with a fin, a fin support, a gate, and a gate dielectric. The fin includes a first crystalline semiconductor material which includes a channel region of the transistor between a source region of the first transistor and a drain region of the transistor. The fin is on a fin support. The fin support includes a second crystalline semiconductor material different from the first crystalline semiconductor material. The first crystalline semiconductor material of the fin and the second crystalline semiconductor material of the fin support form a first heterojunction in between. A gate, gate dielectric, and/or isolation dielectric can be positioned to improve control within the channel.