Fingerprint Validation via Pressure Gradient Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fingerprint identification systems face ergonomic and efficacy issues in distinguishing between real fingers and fraudulent decoys, particularly in unsupervised scenarios, as current methods require complex finger movements to analyze skin elasticity.

Innovation Solution

A validation method using a device with a capture surface, sensor, processing module, and decision-taking module that captures an image, applies a low-pass filter, locates an origin point representing maximum pressure, verifies pressure gradients, and uses a cumulative criterion to determine the validity of the finger, ensuring ergonomic and accurate identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rotation of the finger on the capture surface is used to induce image distortion for analyzing skin elasticity, then the ability to distinguish real fingers from decoys is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to complex movement requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to distinguish real fingers from decoysVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically analyzes pressure distribution patterns without requiring the user to perform specific movements. The validation is performed passively as the user simply places their finger on the capture surface, making the process ergonomic while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical movement-based validation (rotating the finger) with a static pressure distribution analysis system. Instead of requiring mechanical action from the user, the system uses pressure sensors to detect the elastic properties of the finger through natural pressure patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If complex finger movements are required to analyze skin elasticity, then the validation accuracy is improved, but the productivity deteriorates due to increased interaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoididentification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs validation during the natural finger placement action itself, without requiring additional steps. The pressure distribution analysis is conducted simultaneously with the identification process, eliminating time loss while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple validation steps are implemented to ensure finger authenticity, then the security is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines fingerprint capture and pressure distribution validation into a single integrated process. The same sensor array used for fingerprint imaging also captures pressure data, eliminating the need for separate validation hardware while maintaining high security standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for constraint-free user interaction and effectively differentiates between real and fake fingers by analyzing pressure distribution patterns, enhancing the security and usability of fingerprint identification systems.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor exhibits a capture surface which serves for the finger to bear on and through which an image of the fingerprint of the finger is captured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Implementation Method 2

a filtering step during which the processing module transforms the captured image into a resulting image by passage through a low-pass filter whose cutoff frequency is much lower than the frequency of the ridges of a print

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow-pass filtering: Filter (electronic)

Implementation Method 3

it is known to use the deformation of the finger on the sensor to verify whether said deformation does indeed correspond to skin whose elasticity characteristics are different from those of the materials used to produce the decoys

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9471827B2Method of validation of the use of a real finger as support of a fingerprint
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 IDEMIA PUBLIC SECURITY FRANCE
  • US9471827B2 patent drawing
  • US9471827B2 patent drawing
  • US9471827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Validation of using a finger as support of a fingerprint may include:placing the support such that it bears;capturing a captured image of the print;transforming the captured image into a resulting image by passage through a low-pass filter;locating on the resulting image an origin point, the intensity of whose pixel is representative of the maximum pressure exerted on the support;verifying that, on the resulting image, for a plurality of radii issuing from the origin point, and for each of said radii, for a plurality of points M, the intensity of the pixel of each point M of said radius is representative of a decline in the pressure exerted on the support as the distance from the origin point to the point M increases, anda decision as regards the validity of the support is taken as a function of the results of the verification step.