Fingerprint Similarity Analysis for Complex Samples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fingerprint similarity analysis techniques for chromatograms are limited by their reliance on retention time as a matching criterion, which is not suitable for complex samples, and they lack automated methods for evaluating mass spectrometry data, leading to time-consuming and inconsistent results.

Innovation Solution

The development of a software solution that employs multiple algorithms for assessing similarity between fingerprint spectra of samples and reference samples, automatically performing qualitative assessments based on chromatographic retention times and mass spectrometry features, and providing automatic generation of new acquisition techniques for further confirmation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If retention time is used as the matching criterion for fingerprint similarity analysis, then the analysis process is simple, but the method is not suitable for complex samples and produces inconsistent results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis process complexityVSAvoidresult consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fingerprint similarity analysis into multiple independent modules: retention time matching module, mass spectral fingerprint matching module, and comprehensive similarity calculation module. Each module processes specific aspects of the comparison independently, allowing the system to handle complex samples reliably while maintaining manageable process complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional retention time matching to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating mass spectral fingerprint data as an additional dimension. This dimensional expansion enables the system to differentiate compounds that co-elute in chromatography, significantly improving result consistency for complex samples while adding structured complexity to the analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If manual evaluation methods are used for mass spectrometry data, then flexibility is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidanalysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the system automatically performs mass spectral fingerprint extraction, peak alignment, similarity calculation, and result interpretation without manual intervention. The automated workflow maintains operational flexibility through configurable parameters while dramatically improving analysis efficiency and consistency by eliminating human variability in the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables flexible parameter configuration for different analysis scenarios, allowing users to adjust similarity thresholds, mass tolerance values, and chromatographic alignment parameters. This parameter-based control maintains operational flexibility while the automated processing of these parameters ensures consistent, reproducible results across different samples and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If single algorithm is used for similarity assessment, then the method is simple to implement, but the accuracy and reliability of results are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidsimilarity assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple similarity assessment algorithms (cosine similarity, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Euclidean distance) into a comprehensive evaluation framework. Each algorithm calculates similarity from different mathematical perspectives, and their combined results provide a more accurate and reliable assessment of fingerprint similarity than any single algorithm could achieve alone, while maintaining implementation simplicity through standardized calculation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal similarity assessment system that can handle different sample types, chromatographic conditions, and mass spectrometry configurations through multiple algorithms. This multi-functional approach allows the same system to accurately assess similarity across diverse analytical scenarios, improving measurement precision while maintaining algorithmic complexity at a manageable level through unified software implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250165560A1Fingerprint similarity based sample analysis
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250165560A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165560A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165560A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, an apparatus may include analyzing a sample, and analyzing at least one reference sample. A determination may be made as to whether the sample includes a library match score. Based on a determination that the sample includes the library match score, the library match score and a retention time may be analyzed to determine similarity between the sample and the at least one reference sample.