Fingertip Input Device with Dynamic Motion Restriction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing input devices for computing devices lack effective solutions for restricting user input to specific three-dimensional shapes, which is crucial for applications like CAD, remote surgery, and remotely operated excavators, where precise and safe user interactions are required.

Innovation Solution

An input device comprising motion sensors and actuators that track and restrict the motion of a user's fingertip to a specific three-dimensional shape, providing user input while preventing unwanted movements through haptic feedback and magnetic adherence, reducing strain and improving user safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the fingertip motion is restricted to a three-dimensional shape, then the precision and safety of user input is improved, but the freedom of motion and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of user inputVSAvoidfreedom of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The input device dynamically adjusts the degree of motion restriction based on the operational context. The system can switch between fully restricting fingertip motion to a three-dimensional shape and allowing greater freedom, depending on the specific task requirements. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the constraint level flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides haptic feedback to the user through the actuator, informing them when their fingertip approaches the boundaries of the three-dimensional shape. This feedback mechanism allows users to understand the motion constraints intuitively, reducing the disruption to their natural interaction while maintaining precision and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the fingertip motion is restricted to a three-dimensional shape, then the safety and error reduction is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of user inputVSAvoidcomplexity of input device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The input device integrates multiple functions into a single system: motion sensing, actuation for restriction, haptic feedback, and computational processing. By combining these functions in one device, the overall system complexity is managed more efficiently than if separate components were used for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The input device autonomously determines when motion restriction is needed and automatically activates the actuator without requiring external intervention. The system self-regulates based on detecting when the fingertip approaches the three-dimensional shape boundary, reducing the need for complex external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If the actuator is activated to restrict fingertip motion, then the precision and safety are improved, but the user comfort and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of user inputVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback provided by the actuator is designed to be informative rather than restrictive. It gently guides the user's fingertip within the three-dimensional shape while maintaining natural motion, rather than forcing rigid constraints. This feedback approach preserves user comfort while achieving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts the strength and characteristics of the actuator's influence based on the operational context and user needs. By varying the parameter of motion restriction intensity, the system can maintain precision when needed while preserving comfort and natural movement when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables precise and safe user input within defined three-dimensional shapes, reducing the risk of errors and injuries by providing tactile and kinesthetic feedback, thus enhancing the usability and safety of applications requiring such constraints.

Implementation Method 1

at least one motion sensor configured to be worn on a fingertip of a user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMotion sensing:

Implementation Method 2

providing user input while preventing unwanted movements through haptic feedback and magnetic adherence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback:

Implementation Method 3

providing user input while preventing unwanted movements through haptic feedback and magnetic adherence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic adherence: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11262842B2Input device for a computing device
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11262842B2 patent drawing
  • US11262842B2 patent drawing
  • US11262842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An input device (100) for a computing device (150) is provided, such as a data glove. The input device (100) comprises motion sensor(s) (103) configured to be worn on a fingertip or fingertips of a user, and actuator(s) (104, 114) configured to restrict motion of the fingertip(s) to be within a three-dimensional shape. The input device (100) is operative to track a position of the fingertip(s) using the motion sensor(s) (103), provide the tracked position as user input to the computing device (150), determine whether the computing device requires user input from the fingertip to be within the three-dimensional shape, and in response thereto, activate the actuator(s) (104, 114) configured to restrict motion of the fingertip(s) to be within the three-dimensional shape if the computing device (150) requires user input from the fingertip(s) to be within the three-dimensional shape. Thereby, the user is prevented from moving his/her fingertip(s) to a position in space which renders user input which is not accepted by the computing device (150) receiving the user input.