Finishing Manipulator Torque Control With Parallelogram Arm Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial robots face challenges in performing finishing tasks due to low rigidity, leading to processing deviations and requiring special end-effectors to prevent disturbances, limiting their effectiveness in automated finishing processes.

Innovation Solution

A manipulator with a base, arm, and actuators that include a parallelogram link structure and dynamic decoupling, using feed forward torque control based on self-weight effects to provide stable torque without position or force feedback, allowing for wider working ranges and improved stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If industrial robots are used for finishing works, then automation is achieved, but rigidity is low causing processing deviation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of finishing worksVSAvoidprocessing deviation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulator arm is divided into multiple links connected by joints, with each link and joint optimized for specific functions. The parallelogram link set is segmented into first and second links with separate actuators, allowing independent control and compensation for rigidity issues in each segment while maintaining overall automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manipulator employs dynamic decoupling between the first and second joints through the parallelogram structure, where the second joint provides leverage effect to compensate for rigidity variations. The feed forward torque control dynamically adjusts actuator forces based on predicted loads, maintaining precision during automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If closed servo systems are employed in industrial robots, then control precision is improved, but user accessibility is limited requiring special end-effectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulator uses feed forward torque control that calculates required actuator forces based on known system dynamics and desired trajectories. This open-loop approach with pre-calculated compensation maintains control precision while allowing direct user manipulation without restrictive closed servo systems, eliminating the need for special end-effectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If parallelogram link structure is added to the manipulator, then stiffness and working range are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestiffnessVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The parallelogram link structure merges the first and second links into a coordinated mechanism where the second link mirrors the first link's motion. This geometric constraint provides stiffness and stability while the shared actuator control reduces the number of independent control systems needed, balancing structural complexity with performance benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If feed forward torque control is used without position or force feedback, then system simplicity is maintained, but control accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidfinishing work accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feed forward torque control calculates and applies the required actuator forces in advance based on the known dynamics of the manipulator and the planned trajectory. By pre-compensating for gravitational effects, inertial forces, and Coriolis forces, the system achieves accurate finishing work without requiring complex real-time feedback loops, maintaining simplicity while ensuring precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables uniform and smooth torque control, expanding the working range and overcoming limitations of traditional compliance control methods, resulting in more stable and efficient finishing processes.

Implementation Method 1

the second joint provides a leverage effect on the arm by the parallelogram structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeverage effect: Lever

Implementation Method 2

a processor determining a driving torque of each of the plurality of actuators considering a self-weight effect of the manipulator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11745342B2Manipulator for finishing work, and control method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 GWANGJU INST OF SCI & TECH
  • US11745342B2 patent drawing
  • US11745342B2 patent drawing
  • US11745342B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the present disclosure provides a manipulator for a finishing work, including: a base; an arm comprising a plurality of links, a plurality of joints connecting the plurality of links, and a plurality of actuators generating rotation of at least some of the plurality of joints; and a processor determining a driving torque of each of the plurality of actuators considering a self-weight effect of the manipulator and controlling the plurality of actuators based on the determined driving torque.