Finite-Element Surrogates for Adaptive Object Behavior Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-based systems struggle to learn 3D object geometries for various physics problems with complex material properties and interactions, often relying on pre-labeled parameters that lack adaptability and requiring computationally expensive physics calculations.

Innovation Solution

Integrate information from 3D geometries, finite element models, and simulation data to construct graph/multi-graph representations, using advanced machine learning techniques like Recurrent Neural Networks and transformers to predict physics solutions efficiently, leveraging historical physics-based data without repeated simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional finite element systems are used to determine object behavior, then physics-based accuracy is maintained, but computational cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysics solution accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing physics solutions through finite element analysis for multiple geometric configurations and storing them in a training dataset. This allows the neural network to learn from these pre-computed results and make rapid predictions without repeating expensive physics calculations, thereby reducing computation time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy (neural network model) that replicates the behavior of the complex finite element system. The neural network is trained to copy the input-output relationships of the finite element solver, enabling it to predict object behavior with comparable accuracy but at significantly reduced computational cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If pre-labeled parameters are used in machine learning models, then training efficiency is improved, but adaptability to new geometric features and physics problems decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to new geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal neural network architecture that can handle multiple physics problems (structural mechanics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer) and various geometric configurations through a single unified model. The graph-based representation and attention mechanisms enable the model to adapt to different problem types without requiring problem-specific retraining, achieving both efficiency and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms traditional parameter-based input into graph-based representations that capture geometric and physical relationships in a higher-dimensional space. This dimensional transformation allows the neural network to learn intrinsic patterns and relationships that are not apparent in conventional parameter spaces, improving adaptability to new geometries while maintaining training efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive physics-based data is collected for training, then model accuracy improves, but data processing complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex physics data processing task into distinct components: (1) finite element model preparation and data generation, (2) graph-based data representation and preprocessing, (3) neural network training, and (4) prediction inference. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture while handling comprehensive physics data effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250335670A1Systems and Methods for Neural Network Based Behavior Determination of a Physical Object
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 DASSAULT SYSTEMS AMERICAS CORP
  • US20250335670A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335670A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments perform neural network based behavior determination of physical objects. One such embodiment processes a three-dimensional (3D) numerical-method model representing a physical object to extract (i) 3D geometric data associated with the physical object and (ii) simulation data. The extracted 3D geometric data and simulation data are transformed into a 3D multi-graph. The 3D multi-graph is processed with one or more deep neural network (DNN) and one or more operators to determine behavior of the physical object.