FIR Filter Data Recovery with Independent Gain and Adaptation Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for recovering synchronous data samples from asynchronously oversampled analogue signals are either overly complex or suffer from disadvantages such as adverse interactions between gain control and coefficient adaptation, which affect signal-to-noise ratio and system complexity.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing an FIR filter with automatic gain control, timing recovery, and coefficient adaptation control loops to equalize and reconstruct synchronous data samples, where the coefficient adaptation loop is insensitive to gain control, allowing for simultaneous and continuous operation of automatic gain control and coefficient adaptation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complicated algorithms are used for control systems, then data sample recovery is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sample recoveryVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into separate functional blocks: automatic gain control loop for amplitude variations and coefficient adaptation control loop for spectral characteristics. This segmentation allows each block to handle specific tasks with simpler algorithms, resolving the contradiction between recovery quality and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts FIR filter coefficients in real-time to match spectral characteristics of the signal source, while simultaneously applying gain control. This dynamic adaptation enables simpler control algorithms to achieve effective data recovery by continuously optimizing filter parameters rather than using complex fixed algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If simpler algorithms are used for control systems, then device complexity is reduced, but data sample recovery deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoiddata sample recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters (FIR filter coefficients) dynamically to adapt to varying spectral characteristics. By modifying filter coefficients based on signal analysis, simpler control algorithms can achieve effective data recovery that would otherwise require complex algorithms, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and recovery quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The coefficient adaptation control loop uses feedback from the signal to continuously adjust FIR filter coefficients. This feedback mechanism enables simpler algorithms to maintain effective data recovery by automatically optimizing filter parameters in response to changing spectral characteristics, eliminating the need for complex predetermined algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If gain control and coefficient adaptation interact, then control system is simplified, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into independent loops: gain control loop handling amplitude variations and coefficient adaptation loop handling spectral characteristics. This segmentation prevents adverse interactions between gain control and coefficient adaptation, maintaining high signal-to-noise ratio while keeping the overall system structure simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The independent loop structures act as intermediaries that separate the functions of gain control and coefficient adaptation. By introducing this structural separation, the system avoids direct interaction between these two control mechanisms, preventing the degradation of signal-to-noise ratio that would occur with their interaction, while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8149977B2Recovering data samples
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8149977B2 patent drawing
  • US8149977B2 patent drawing
  • US8149977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus recovers synchronous data samples from an asynchronously over-sampled stream of data samples derived from an input signal the spectral characteristic of which is subject to variation. The apparatus comprises an FIR filter having an input for receiving the asynchronously over-sampled stream of data samples and for producing equalised asynchronous samples. A signal sample reconstruction means reconstructs the synchronous data samples from the equalised asynchronous data samples. An automatic gain control loop is responsive to the reconstructed data samples to apply gain control for producing gain controlled reconstructed samples. A timing recovery means is responsive to the gain controlled reconstructed samples to provide timing information to the signal sample reconstruction means. A coefficient adaptation control loop is responsive to equalised reconstructed asynchronous data samples substantially unaffected by the automatic gain control for adapting the FIR filter coefficients to the variations in the spectral characteristics of the input signal.