Adjustable FIR Transmitter Bypass Logic for Low-Latency Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern electronic devices face latency issues when communicating data between processors, which impairs timely task completion and decreases throughput due to inefficiencies in serial data transmission over communication channels.

Innovation Solution

A finite impulse response (FIR) transmitter with adjustable latency and equalization capabilities, utilizing a plurality of delay elements and driver circuitry, along with bypass logic, to selectively filter and equalize output signals using preceding and succeeding bits of data, thereby reducing latency and power consumption based on performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is transmitted through multiple delay elements for equalization, then signal quality is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter dynamically adjusts the number of delay elements based on channel conditions. When channel quality is good, fewer delay elements are used reducing latency. When channel quality degrades, more delay elements are engaged to improve signal equalization. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between signal quality and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the equalization parameter (number of delay elements) based on performance metrics. By monitoring channel conditions and adjusting the equalization depth, the system optimizes the trade-off between signal quality improvement and latency introduction, allowing adaptive parameter tuning to resolve the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If FIR filtering is applied to equalize output signals, then signal integrity is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter applies partial equalization by selectively enabling only the necessary number of delay elements and FIR filter taps based on channel conditions. Instead of always applying full equalization, the system uses just enough filtering to achieve acceptable signal integrity, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining adequate signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The equalization strength is dynamically adjusted based on channel performance metrics. When channels are good, minimal equalization is applied consuming less power. When channels degrade, equalization is increased to maintain signal integrity. This dynamic adjustment resolves the power consumption versus signal integrity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If adjustable latency and equalization are implemented, then transmission efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidtransmitter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter is segmented into modular components including multiple delay elements, selectable FIR filter structures, and control logic that independently manages equalization parameters. This segmentation allows flexible configuration and adjustment of latency and equalization levels without requiring complete system redesign, thereby managing complexity while maintaining transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitter design uses universal building blocks (delay elements, FIR filter stages) that can be selectively configured for different equalization and latency requirements. The same hardware structures serve multiple functions depending on configuration, reducing overall device complexity compared to having dedicated circuits for each function while still achieving adjustable latency and equalization for improved transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8203362B2Adjustable finite impulse response transmitter
Publication Date: 2012.06.19 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US8203362B2 patent drawing
  • US8203362B2 patent drawing
  • US8203362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are provided for generating output signals representative of bits of serial data. A transmitter comprises a plurality of delay elements, driver circuitry, and bypass logic coupled between the plurality of delay elements and the driver circuitry. The plurality of delay elements delay serialized data, resulting in delayed serialized data, and the driver circuitry generates an output signal representative of a first bit of the delayed serialized data. The bypass logic is configured to selectively bypass one or more delay elements of the plurality of delay elements to provide the first bit of the delayed serialized data to the driver circuitry.