Fire Detection System Design Framework for Optimal Device Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fire detection systems face challenges in designing optimal placements for fire detection, suppression, and escape devices within buildings, often leading to non-compliance with regulations and inefficient fire safety measures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine the optimal locations for fire detection, suppression, and escape devices within a building by analyzing building maps, floor plans, and potential fire risks, generating maps, and activating alerts for non-compliant placements, while allowing user input and real-time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional fire detection systems use distributed components designed and installed manually, then installation flexibility is maintained, but design complexity and compliance risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to automatically design and configure fire detection system layouts through an interactive interface. Users input building information and select device types, then the system automatically determines optimal device locations, generates placement maps, and validates compliance with fire safety regulations, eliminating the need for complex manual design processes while maintaining installation flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback during the design process by validating device placements against fire safety constraints. The interactive interface immediately indicates whether proposed device locations comply with regulations, allowing users to adjust placements dynamically while the system continuously checks for compliance, reducing design complexity through guided interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual design processes are used for fire detection systems, then user control over device placement is maintained, but time consumption and error risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and constraint validations automatically based on building parameters and fire safety regulations. Before the user finalizes device placements, the system pre-determines optimal locations and checks compliance, significantly reducing the time required for manual design while maintaining user control through interactive adjustment capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The interactive interface provides immediate feedback on design compliance and optimization opportunities. The system validates device placements in real-time and guides users through corrections, reducing design time by preventing compliance errors before they occur while maintaining user control over final device locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If fire detection devices are placed without automated validation, then installation simplicity is maintained, but compliance with fire safety regulations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidcompliance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automated validation that continuously checks device placements against fire safety regulations. The interactive interface provides immediate feedback on compliance status, ensuring that all device locations meet required standards while maintaining simple installation procedures. This automated checking mechanism eliminates compliance errors without complicating the installation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically validates compliance and generates certification documentation without requiring manual verification. Users simply input building information and select device types, then the system automatically determines optimal locations, checks regulatory compliance, and generates placement maps with validation results, maintaining installation simplicity while ensuring reliable compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11511142B2Fire detection system—end-to-end solution for fire detection design framework
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION LLC
  • US11511142B2 patent drawing
  • US11511142B2 patent drawing
  • US11511142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of designing a fire detection system including: determining a location of one or more fire detection devices within the building; and generating a map that displays the location of one or more fire detection device.