Fire Detection Noise Analysis for Thermal Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire detection systems in waste incineration and recycling plants face challenges in distinguishing between thermal disturbances from vehicles and actual fires, leading to false alarms and reduced early detection effectiveness due to thermal interference from hot exhaust pipes and machinery.

Innovation Solution

Combining infrared and video analysis with noise or vibration analysis, using differentiated volume thresholds for daytime and nighttime operations, and employing directional microphones or vibration sensors to differentiate between vehicle interference and potential fires.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the temperature threshold is set low (e.g., 80°C) for early fire detection, then fires can be detected earlier, but thermal disturbances from vehicles and machinery cause false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire detection timeVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple independent analysis channels: infrared thermal analysis, video image analysis, and audio noise analysis. Each channel processes specific features separately, and only when all channels confirm a fire event does the system trigger an alarm. This segmentation allows the system to maintain low temperature thresholds for early detection while using multi-channel verification to filter out false alarms from thermal disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Audio noise analysis serves as an intermediary verification mechanism between thermal detection and alarm triggering. The system analyzes characteristic fire-related noises (crackling, hissing) as an intermediate step to confirm whether a thermal event is a genuine fire or a false disturbance from vehicles or machinery. This intermediary layer resolves the contradiction by adding a verification step that maintains sensitivity while reducing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If the detection area is increased to cover more of the heap surface, then more fires can be detected, but thermal disturbances from larger areas increase false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection areaVSAvoidthermal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The detection area is divided into multiple small detection zones or pixels across the heap surface. Each zone is analyzed independently for thermal anomalies, and only zones showing consistent fire characteristics across multiple analysis channels (infrared, video, audio) trigger alarms. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage while reducing false alarms from isolated thermal disturbances in any single area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different analysis methods are applied to different spatial scales: infrared analysis at pixel level for hot spot detection, video analysis at region level for flame pattern recognition, and audio analysis for localized noise sources. This local quality approach allows the system to maintain high detection sensitivity in each local area while using multi-scale verification to filter out widespread thermal disturbances from vehicles or machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If vehicles are restricted during daytime operation to reduce thermal disturbances, then false alarms decrease, but operational efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fire detection system performs self-verification by analyzing multiple independent parameters (thermal patterns, video features, audio characteristics) simultaneously. When vehicles are present, the system automatically distinguishes between vehicle thermal signatures and genuine fires by comparing patterns across all three channels, eliminating the need for manual vehicle restrictions while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts analysis parameters based on detected conditions: when vehicle activity is detected through audio or thermal patterns, the system adapts its sensitivity thresholds and verification requirements for that specific time and location. This allows full operational efficiency to be maintained while the system intelligently filters out vehicle-related false alarms through real-time parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more reliable early fire detection by accurately distinguishing between thermal disturbances and actual fires, reducing false alarms and enhancing the sensitivity of fire detection systems.

Implementation Method 1

The early fire detection in infrared camera-based early fire detection systems is realized by exceeding a limit temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

an additional noise or vibration analysis by measuring the noise level of vehicles located in the area to be detected or other thermal sources of interference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNoise detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentEP3167937B1Method for eliminating thermal perturbations in the infrared and video early fire detection
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 ORGLMEISTER ALBERT

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for eliminating thermal interference in infrared and video fire early detection systems in waste incineration plants, recycling plants, open storage facilities, and the like. The method is characterized by an additional noise or vibration analysis performed by measuring the noise level of vehicles or other thermal interference sources located in the area to be detected, differentiating between daytime and nighttime operation when measuring the noise level. The volume thresholds are then determined and used as threshold values ​​to decide whether to trigger fire suppression.