Automated Fire Detection System Design for Optimal Device Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fire detection systems face challenges in designing optimal placements for fire detection, suppression, and escape devices within buildings, which can lead to inefficiencies and non-compliance with safety regulations, necessitating a method to determine device numbers and locations based on fire probability and building-specific factors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine the probability of a fire in a room by analyzing geometry, flammability of objects, and hazards, then calculate the required number and placement of fire detection and suppression devices, as well as evacuation points, while ensuring compliance with constraints and generating a map for device locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional manual design methods are used for fire detection systems, then designers can exercise judgment and adaptability, but the design process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process efficiencyVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical design processes with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to calculate fire probabilities and determine optimal device placements, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual calculations and iterations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the design process by changing from qualitative manual judgment to quantitative automated calculation using fire probability parameters, room geometry data, and regulatory constraints to automatically determine device numbers and locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fire detection systems are designed without automated optimization, then simpler design processes are used, but device placement may not be optimal leading to compliance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoiddesign system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the automated design algorithm continuously evaluates proposed device placements against regulatory constraints and fire probability models, adjusting placements until compliance is achieved or constraints are violated, ensuring reliable compliance through iterative optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated software intermediary that acts as a mediator between design requirements and regulatory compliance, using algorithms to translate complex regulatory standards into actionable device placement recommendations that ensure compliance without requiring designers to manually interpret regulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If more fire detection and suppression devices are installed, then fire safety coverage is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire safety coverageVSAvoidnumber of devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by determining device placements based on local fire probability characteristics of different room areas, concentrating devices in high-probability zones and reducing them in low-probability areas, thereby optimizing safety coverage while minimizing the total number of devices required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12190020B2Fire detection system—method for auto placement of fire equipment
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION LLC
  • US12190020B2 patent drawing
  • US12190020B2 patent drawing
  • US12190020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of designing a fire detection system comprising: determining a probability of a fire in a room; determining a number of fire detection devices for a fire detection system within the room in response to the probability of the fire in the room; determining a number of fire suppression devices for the fire detection system within the room in response to the probability of a fire in the room; and determining a location of each of the fire detection devices within the room and a location of the fire suppression devices within the room.