Fire Device Predictive Maintenance via Remote Health Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fire system maintenance requires on-site visits for data retrieval and monitoring, leading to time-consuming and costly site visits, often resulting in reactive rather than proactive maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a computing device connected to a fire panel via a gateway device for remote monitoring, which retrieves fire system device data and uses machine learning to predict device behavior and timelines for maintenance, false alarms, and replacements, allowing for predictive maintenance and reducing site visits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If on-site visits are conducted for data retrieval and monitoring, then device maintenance can be performed, but time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire system reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fire system devices perform self-diagnostics and automatically report their status, health metrics, and maintenance needs through integrated sensors and communication modules. This self-monitoring capability eliminates the need for manual on-site inspections, allowing the system to service itself while maintaining high reliability through continuous automated surveillance of device conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where device data is automatically collected, analyzed, and used to trigger maintenance alerts. Health metrics, operational parameters, and anomaly detections are fed back to the monitoring platform, enabling proactive maintenance scheduling based on actual device conditions rather than fixed intervals, thus reducing unnecessary site visits while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If on-site visits are conducted for data retrieval and monitoring, then device maintenance can be performed, but costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire system reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The fire system devices perform self-diagnostics and automatically report their status, health metrics, and maintenance needs through integrated sensors and communication modules. This self-monitoring capability eliminates the need for manual on-site inspections, allowing the system to service itself while maintaining high reliability through continuous automated surveillance of device conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of conducting full on-site inspections for all devices, the system performs partial monitoring remotely and only dispatches technicians when actual maintenance needs are identified through automated analysis. This selective approach reduces unnecessary travel and associated costs while maintaining reliability by focusing resources on devices that truly require attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If reactive maintenance is performed, then maintenance can be conducted, but system reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance operationVSAvoidfire system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors device health metrics and operational parameters to detect early signs of degradation or failure. By identifying potential issues before they manifest as actual failures, the system enables preliminary maintenance actions that prevent reliability degradation. This proactive approach maintains ease of operation by scheduling maintenance during convenient times rather than responding to emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where device data is automatically collected, analyzed, and used to trigger maintenance alerts. Health metrics, operational parameters, and anomaly detections are fed back to the monitoring platform, enabling proactive maintenance scheduling based on actual device conditions rather than fixed intervals, thus reducing unnecessary site visits while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4328883A1Maintenance prediction for devices of a fire system
Publication Date: 2024.02.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4328883A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4328883A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4328883A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Devices, systems, and methods for maintenance prediction for devices of a fire system are described herein. In some examples, one or more embodiments include a computing device comprising a memory and a processor to execute instructions stored in the memory to receive fire system device data of a fire device in a fire system and generate a fire device analysis based on the fire system device data, where the fire device analysis includes a predicted behavior of the fire device and a predicted timeline for the predicted behavior of the fire device.